International disability rights advocacy : languages of moral knowledge and institutional critique /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Pateisky, Daniel, author.
Imprint:Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.
©2021
Description:1 online resource ( x, 198 pages) : illustrations
Language:English
Series:Interdisciplinary disability studies
Interdisciplinary disability studies.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12727228
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781003030782
1003030785
9781000367058
1000367053
100036710X
9781000367102
9780367467425
9780367686444
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Daniel Pateisky is a lecturer at the University of Vienna, Austria, an advocate in Austrian and international disability policy and social work, and a member of Vienna's Independent Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. He holds a doctorate in Sociology from the University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, that focussed on international disability human rights and drew on his interdisciplinary background in development studies and linguistics. His research revolves around critical, post-colonial, and participatory approaches to dis/ability, international translation of human rights, and the nexusbetween older persons' rights, care labour, and migration. He has been assisting young people with chronic illnesses, consulting in student disability services in higher education, and helping develop reasonable accommodation measures.
Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on April 06, 2021).
Other form:Print version: Pateisky, Daniel. International disability rights advocacy. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2021 9780367467425
Standard no.:10.4324/9781003030782
Table of Contents:
  • Theory with unstable referents
  • Methodical approach
  • Reflecting languages and symbols
  • Paradigmatic lines and actor relationships
  • Reconciling multiple knowledges
  • Categorising and explaining as knowledge change
  • Advocacy knowledge as political-legal intervention
  • Final discussion
  • Addendum.