Ethnographers before Malinowski : pioneers of anthropological fieldwork, 1870-1922 /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Imprint:New York : Berghahn, 2022.
©2022
Description:1 online resource (xviii, 522 pages) : illustrations.
Language:English
Series:EASA series; 44
EASA series ; v. 44.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12773814
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Rosa, Frederico Delgado, 1969- editor.
Vermeulen, Han F., 1952- editor.
ISBN:9781800735323 (electronic bk.)
1800735324 (electronic bk.)
9781800735316
1800735316
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on print version record.
Other form:Online version: Ethnographers before Malinowski New York : Berghahn Books, 2022 9781800735323
Original 9781800735316 1800735316
Standard no.:40031213529
Review by Choice Review

The canonical history of modern sociocultural anthropology ordinarily begins with the field research and writings of Bronisław Malinowski and the structural-functional theory of A. R. Radcliffe Brown. The 19th-century evolutionists, such as Edward Burnett Tylor and James George Frazer, are admitted as precursors, but the fieldworkers who preceded Malinowski are usually acknowledged only by dismissal, with the possible exception of Lewis Henry Morgan in the US. The introductory and concluding chapters in this collection explore the historical and disciplinary contexts of this dismissal. Each of the intervening 12 chapters reevaluates a neglected ethnographic text and its author dating between 1870 and 1922, a period rich in valuable fieldwork. The restoration of these neglected ethnographers and their work is intended to break the artificial barrier that excludes them from the post-Malinowski canon. Unsurprisingly, these rejected ancestors include women, Indigenous experts, non-Europeans, nonprofessionals who nevertheless spent years among the people they wrote about, and recognized theoreticians whose ethnographic work was ignored. This volume, its contributing authors, and the fieldworkers and ethnographies they restore constitute a creative, necessary resistance to iconoclastic, postcolonial assaults on anthropology. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Advanced undergraduates through faculty; professionals. --Riva Berleant-Schiller, emerita, University of Connecticut

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review