Sentencing and artificial intelligence /
Saved in:
| Imprint: | New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2023] ©2022 |
|---|---|
| Description: | 1 online resource. |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Studies in penal theory and philosophy Studies in penal theory and philosophy. |
| Subject: | |
| Format: | E-Resource Book |
| URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/13502872 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 13502872 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 211208r20232022nyu fob 001|0|eng|d | ||
| 005 | 20240731132816.4 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780197539569 |q ebook |c No price | ||
| 035 | 9 | |a (OSO_Philosophy)9780197539569 | |
| 035 | |a (StDuBDS)9780197539569 | ||
| 040 | |a StDuBDS |b eng |c StDuBDS |e rda |e pn | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K5121 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |2 ukslc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LN |2 thema | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 345.0772 |2 23 |
| 090 | |a XXK5121 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Sentencing and artificial intelligence / |c edited by Jesper Ryberg and Julian V. Roberts. |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York, NY : |b Oxford University Press, |c [2023] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2022 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource. | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Studies in penal theory and philosophy | |
| 500 | |a Previously issued in print: 2022. | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 520 | 8 | |a Is it morally acceptable to use artificial intelligence (AI) in the determination of sentences on those who have broken the law? If so, how should such algorithms be used - and what are the consequences? Jesper Ryberg and Julian V. Roberts bring together leading experts to answer these questions. This book investigates to what extent, and under which conditions, justice and the social good may be promoted by allocating parts of the most important task of the criminal court - that of determining legal punishment - to computerized sentencing algorithms. The introduction of an AI-based sentencing system could save significant resources and increase consistency across jurisdictions. But it could also reproduce historical biases, decrease transparency in decision-making, and undermine trust in the justice system. | |
| 521 | |a Specialized. | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on February 24, 2023). | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Sentences (Criminal procedure) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Artificial intelligence. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Law. |2 ukslc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law. |2 thema | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ryberg, Jesper, |e editor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Roberts, Julian V., |e editor. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version : |z 9780197539538 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Studies in penal theory and philosophy. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Philosophy |u https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197539538.001.0001 |y Oxford Scholarship Online |
| 929 | |a eresource | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i 3ae82526-a3ed-46db-a0fc-012090b0064a |s 59e2a108-2cbb-4153-83bd-7ab44dc69906 |
| 928 | |t Library of Congress classification |a XXK5121 |l Online |c UC-FullText |u https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197539538.001.0001 |z Oxford Scholarship Online |m Philosophy |g ebooks |i 13645634 | ||