Plague of informers : conspiracy and political trust in William III's England /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Weil, Rachel.
Imprint:New Haven : Yale University Press, ©2014.
Description:1 online resource (xiii, 344 pages)
Language:English
Series:The Lewis Walpole series in eighteenth-century culture and history
Lewis Walpole series in eighteenth-century culture and history.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/13539223
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780300199284
0300199287
1306370620
9781306370622
9780300171044
0300171048
Digital file characteristics:data file
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Print version record.
Summary:"Stories of plots, sham plots, and the citizen-informers who discovered them are at the center of Rachel Weil's compelling study of the turbulent decade following the Revolution of 1688. Most studies of the Glorious Revolution focus on its causes or long-term effects, but Weil instead zeroes in on the early years when the survival of the new regime was in doubt. By encouraging informers, imposing loyalty oaths, suspending habeas corpus, and delaying the long-promised reform of treason trial procedure, the Williamite regime protected itself from enemies and cemented its bonds with supporters, but also put its own credibility at risk"--
Other form:Print version: Weil, Rachel Judith. Plague of informers. New Haven : Yale University Press, [2013] 9780300171044
Review by Choice Review

This book has a contemporary resonance. Weil (Cornell) seeks to explain how a new regime of doubtful legal authority justifies and defends itself. In the attempt to obtain trust and credit, the regime used means--e.g., suspension of habeas corpus, the use of informers and subornation--that called into question the chief justification for William's descent upon England: to secure the liberties of English subjects. Weil does much with the complicated politics of the era and unravels plots--real and imagined--with brio and clarity. The concluding chapter on the assassination plot is a bravura performance. There are omissions. Weil has nothing to say about the Irish and Scottish dimensions of the Glorious Revolution; oddly, William and Mary have no part in the story. Weil does not address the more pragmatic efforts to secure the credit (literally) of the nation, such as the recoinage and founding of the Bank of England. Like other authors, she fails to grasp that it was the deliberate underfunding of the government by the House of Commons rather than the Triennial Act that required annual meetings of parliament. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. D. R. Bisson Belmont University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review