Climate change : examining the facts /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Bedford, Daniel, author.
Imprint:Santa Barbara, California : ABC-CLIO, [2016]
©2016
Description:1 online resource (xvi, 214 pages) : illustrations.
Language:English
Series:Contemporary debates
Contemporary debates.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/13539887
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Cook, John (Climatologist), author.
ISBN:9781440835698
1440835691
9781440835681
1440835683
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Print version record.
Summary:Climate change is one of the most controversial and misunderstood issues of the 21st century. This book provides a clear understanding of the issue by presenting scientific facts to refute falsehoods and misinformation--and to confirm the validity of other assertions.
Other form:Print version: Bedford, Daniel. Climate change. Santa Barbara, California : ABC-CLIO, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, [2016] 9781440835681
Review by Choice Review

One wonders why there cannot be a popular, science-based book arguing the case for human climate change that is not full of loaded language, arguments that confuse plausible explanations with factual evidence, and other basic logical errors. Is the case for global warming truly this weak? This book, which is part of the "Contemporary Debates" series, is advertised by the publisher as giving "readers a clear and unbiased understanding of current issues." Yet, the authors' point of view is firm and clear from the start--even within the table of contents. This is a well-written and nicely presented volume, but no debate is even attempted, or much less embraced. This is an unnecessary addition to a currently flooded genre: books on climate change aimed at general audiences in order to persuade readers toward a particular political position. Any material written by the popular environmental activist and author Bill McKibben would have the same level of scientific and logical accuracy, and also be more entertaining. Summing Up: Not recommended. --Thomas N. Chase, University of Colorado

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review