Fake it : fictions of forgery /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Osteen, Mark, author.
Imprint:Charlottesville : University of Virginia Press, 2021.
©2021
Description:1 online resource : color illustrations
Language:English
Series:mrj / YBP CIP upgrade
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/13543080
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780813946283
081394628X
9780813946269
9780813946276
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on August 09, 2021).
Summary:"This book investigates fictional forgeries, from Thomas Chatterton's phony "medieval" poems written in the eighteenth century, to forged documents attributed to Shakespeare created in the nineteenth century, to Clifford Irving's fake autobiography of Howard Hughes in the twentieth century"--
Other form:Print version: Osteen, Mark. Fake it Charlottesville : University of Virginia Press, 2021. 9780813946269
Review by Choice Review

Osteen (Loyola Univ., Maryland) considers a wide range of "fakes" (broadly understood) committed or recounted by six writers and one filmmaker from the 18th century to the present: Thomas Chatterton, William Henry Ireland, Peter Carey, Percival Everett, William Gaddis, Orson Welles, and Siri Hustvedt. The book is not driven by an argument, but "fifteen theses" spelled out in the introduction summarize the lessons readers learn from the case studies. It is not certain whether any of the 15 are, strictly speaking, true--at least those that contain words such as always instead of often--but they are provocative. Asking productive questions, in fact, is Osteen's main strength; providing convincing answers does not seem to be a priority. For the pre-20th-century material, Osteen leans too hard on modern secondary sources, not always academically rigorous, and he picks up some of their factual errors. But though the historical scholarship is sometimes lacking, the close readings are consistently insightful and rewarding, and the prose manages to be both accessible and formally experimental at the same time. Fake It is engaging and stimulating. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, researchers, faculty. --Jack Lynch, Rutgers University--Newark

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review