Identified Skeletal Collections.
Saved in:
Author / Creator: | Henderson, Charlotte Yvette. |
---|---|
Imprint: | Oxford : Archaeopress, 2018. |
Description: | 1 online resource (198 p.) |
Language: | English |
Subject: | |
Format: | E-Resource Book |
URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/13543181 |
Table of Contents:
- Cover
- Copyright information
- Contents
- Introduction
- Charlotte Henderson
- What are identified human skeletal collections?
- Conception of the book
- Why are they so useful?
- Biases
- Identified but anonymous
- Dignity and respect
- References
- Archaeological human skeletal collections: their significance and value as an ongoing contribution to research
- Introduction
- Jelena Bekvalac1 and Dr Rebecca Redfern1
- Archaeological Human Skeletal Remains Collections, Museum of London
- Centre for Human Bioarchaeology
- Research
- Research Output
- Destructive Sampling
- Biographical collections
- Outreach, Teaching and Exhibitions
- Conclusion
- References
- The Grant Human Skeletal Collection and Other Contributions of J. C. B. Grant to Anatomy, Osteology, and Forensic Anthropology
- Introduction
- John Albanese1,2
- The University of Edinburgh and the University of Durham: 1909-1919
- The University of Manitoba: 1919-1930
- The University of Toronto and the University of California at Los Angeles: 1930-1973
- Grant's Legacy: James E. Anderson and Physical Anthropology in Canada
- The Grant Human Skeletal Collection
- Discussion and Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References Cited
- Strategies for Dealing with Bias in Identified Reference Collections and Implications for Research in the 21st Century
- Introduction
- John Albanese1,2
- A Model for Identifying and Assessing the Sources and Nature of Bias: An Approach to Pursuing Research Using Identified Skeletal Collections
- Cemetery Studies Theory and Methods
- The New Biocultural Synthesis
- From Living Population to Available Sample
- From Available Sample to Observed Sample
- Discussion: Examples of the Efficacy of this Approach
- Methods for Estimating Sex
- Assessing Patterns of Human Variation and the Study of Past Populations
- Methods for Estimating Stature
- Beyond Race and Ancestry
- Conclusion
- References
- Bioarchaeology and Identified Skeletal Collections: Problems and Potential Solutions
- Introduction
- Jennifer Sharman1 and John Albanese2,3
- What Were the Reasons for Collecting and What was the Source of the Skeletons?
- Anatomical Collections
- The Dart Collection
- The Pretoria Collection
- The Terry Collection
- Grant Collection
- Cemetery Collections
- Modern Cemetery Collections: The Coimbra Collection
- Potential Impacts of Curation
- Who is in the Collection?
- Basic Demographic Parameters: Age and Sex
- 'Race' and Human Variation
- Socioeconomic Status
- Age
- How Well-Known are 'Known' Ages?
- When Did the People Die and When Did Collecting Occur?
- Where Did the Skeletons (People) Come From?
- Immigrants? From How Far?
- Local People?
- Why Were Particular Skeletons Added to the Collection?
- Research Using Documented Collections: Impact and Interrelationship of 'Who, What, When, Where, Why'
- Example 1: Accuracy of Age-at-Death Data and Age Heaping for the Terry Collection