|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 a 4500 |
| 001 |
1390968 |
| 003 |
ICU |
| 005 |
19970808155100.0 |
| 008 |
921116s1992 nyua b 001 0 eng |
| 010 |
|
|
|a 92028034
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0306442841
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (ICU)BID16349969
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)26309334
|
| 040 |
|
|
|c DLC
|d DLC
|d ICU$dOrLoB
|
| 043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
| 050 |
0 |
0 |
|a KF9329
|b .S66 1992
|
| 082 |
|
|
|a 345.73/02532
|a 347.3052532
|2 20
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Spohn, Cassia
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n92071393
|1 http://viaf.org/viaf/54314507/
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Rape law reform :
|b a grassroots revolution and its impact /
|c Cassia Spohn and Julie Horney.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a New York :
|b Plenum Press,
|c c1992.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 192 p. :bill. ;
|c 24 cm.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/txt
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a unmediated
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/n
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a volume
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/nc
|
| 440 |
|
0 |
|a Plenum series in crime and justice
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (p. 177-180) and index.
|
| 505 |
0 |
0 |
|g 1.
|t The Rape Reform Movement.
|t Criticisms of Traditional Rape Law.
|t Reforming the Law.
|t Definitional Changes.
|t Consent Standard.
|t Corroboration Requirement.
|t Evidence of Victim's Sexual Conduct.
|t Previous Research --
|g 2.
|t Rape Law Reform in Six Jurisdictions.
|t Strong Reforms - Michigan, Illinois, and Pennsylvania.
|t Weak Reforms - Texas, Georgia, and Washington, D.C.
|t Rape Shield Laws.
|t Strong Shield Laws.
|t Weak Shield Laws.
|t Procedures for Determining Relevance.
|t Summary of Law Reforms --
|g 3.
|t Contextual Differences and Case-Processing Variations.
|t Case-Screening Procedures.
|t The Courtroom Work Group.
|t The Judiciary.
|t Prosecution and Defense.
|t Outside Influences.
|t Courtroom Work Groups and the Rape Law Reforms.
|t Case Processing and Case Outcomes.
|t Arrest and Indictment Rates.
|t Conviction Rates and Case Outcomes.
|t Case Processing and the Rape Law Reforms --
|g 4.
|t The Instrumental Effects of Reform.
|t Analytical Framework.
|t The "History" Threat.
|t Controls for the History Threat.
|t Data Sources.
|t Case Selection.
|t Dependent Variables.
|t Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.
|t Impact on Case Processing.
|t Detroit.
|t Chicago.
|t Philadelphia.
|t Washington, D.C.
|t Atlanta.
|t Houston.
|t Positive Impact.
|t Reports.
|t Indictments --
|g 5.
|t Officials' Evaluations of Rape Cases.
|t Assessments of the Importance of Evidence.
|t Extralegal Factors and Decision Making.
|t Officials' Assessments of Evidence.
|t Officials' Evaluations of Evidence and the Rape Law Reforms.
|t Responses to Rape Case Vignettes.
|t The Vignettes.
|t Analytic Procedure.
|t Admitting Sexual History Evidence.
|t Likelihood of Conviction.
|t Sentence Severity.
|t The Impact of Reforms on the Evaluation of Evidence --
|g 6.
|t Officials' Attitudes toward Sexual History Evidence.
|t Controversy Surrounding the Rape Shield Laws.
|t The Women's Rights Project Proposal.
|t Hypothetical Cases.
|t Analytic Techniques.
|t Results - Evidence Would Be Admitted.
|t Jurisdictional Differences.
|t Evidentiary Differences.
|t Results - Evidence Should Be Admitted.
|t Rape Shield Laws and Officials' Judgments of Relevance.
|t Influence of Variations in the Laws.
|t Influence of Informal Norms.
|t The Impact of Rape Shield Laws --
|g 7.
|t The Limits of Legal Reforms.
|t Definitional Changes.
|t Elimination of Corroboration and Resistance Requirements.
|t Requirements Not Serious Hurdles.
|t Importance of Corroboration and Resistance Evidence.
|t Rape Shield Laws.
|t Inherent Limitations of the Rape Shield Laws.
|t Implementation of the Rape Shield Laws.
|t Strong versus Weak Shield Laws.
|t Reform in Detroit.
|t Conclusion.
|t Victim-Oriented Reforms.
|t Value of Symbolic Change.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Rape
|z United States.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008110462
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Rape victims
|x Services for
|z United States
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010109540
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Rape.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst01089970
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Rape victims
|x Services for.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst01090037
|
| 651 |
|
7 |
|a United States.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst01204155
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Horney, Julie
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n85115280
|1 http://viaf.org/viaf/33429229/
|
| 850 |
|
|
|a ICU
|
| 901 |
|
|
|a ToCBNA
|
| 903 |
|
|
|a HeVa
|
| 929 |
|
|
|a cat
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 6dbca3f6-b270-50b9-9344-e785f1ed11e7
|s 6ae8ab87-0785-5229-b3e9-9c4967d15d8d
|
| 928 |
|
|
|t Library of Congress classification
|a XXKF9329.S660 1992
|l DLL
|c DLL-Law
|i 2382765
|
| 927 |
|
|
|t Library of Congress classification
|a XXKF9329.S660 1992
|l DLL
|c DLL-Law
|b 36676501
|i 2750175
|
