A Hague convention on jurisdiction and judgments : why did the Judgments Project (1992-2001) fail? /
Saved in:
| Author / Creator: | Jueptner, Eva, author. |
|---|---|
| Imprint: | Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Chicago : Intersentia, [2024] ©2024 |
| Description: | xxv, 245 pages ; 23 cm |
| Language: | English |
| Subject: | |
| Format: | Print Book |
| URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/14118083 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 14118083 | ||
| 005 | 20250116161823.8 | ||
| 008 | 240429t20242024enk b 001 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | 9 | |a (GOBI)90100894375 | |
| 040 | |a OHX |b eng |e rda |c OHX |d YDX |d BDX |d AUXAM |d NLVRD |d QGK |d OCLCO |d YDX | ||
| 019 | |a 1412001938 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781839704321 | ||
| 020 | |a 1839704322 |q paperback | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9781839704321 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1432072620 |z (OCoLC)1412001938 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K7680 |b .J84 2024 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a K |2 lcco | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 347.077 |2 23 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Jueptner, Eva, |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Hague convention on jurisdiction and judgments : |b why did the Judgments Project (1992-2001) fail? / |c Eva Jueptner. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge ; |a Antwerp ; |a Chicago : |b Intersentia, |c [2024] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2024 | |
| 300 | |a xxv, 245 pages ; |c 23 cm | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a unmediated |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a volume |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Based on the author's thesis (PhD). | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 217-231) and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction: The history of a Hague Judgments Convention -- The choice of the negotiating agency: law making at the Hague Conference on Private International Law -- Did the Judgments Project fail because no comprehensive feasibility studies regarding the convention type were prepared? -- Did the Judgments Project fail due to a lack of interest from the Member States of the European Community and the United States? -- Did the Judgments Project fail due to a lack of project management by the Permanent Bureau? -- Did the Judgments Project fail due to a lack of preparation of the Special Commission meetings between 1997 and 1999? -- Did the Judgments Project fail because the basis for consensus-building was missing during the Diplomatic Session? -- Did the Judgments Project fail because the United States voiced their concerns about the project too late in time? -- Did the Judgments Project fail because the opposition of the European bloc towards a true mixed convention would have been impossible to overcome? -- Conclusions: Lessons (to be) drawn from the failure of the Judgments Project. | |
| 520 | |a A Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments (1992-2001): Why did the Judgments Project Fail? provides the first comprehensive analysis of the question of why the original Judgments Project of the Hague Conference on Private International Law failed in 2001. The 'Judgments Project', sometimes referred to as the holy grail of private international law, was a remarkable and important undertaking. Its purpose was to create a global regime to secure the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters, as well as globally applicable rules on international direct jurisdiction, determining which national courts can hear international civil and commercial proceedings. Key players in the project included the member states of the European Community and the United States of America. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Judgments, Foreign. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Jurisdiction (International law) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Conflict of laws |x Jurisdiction. | |
| 929 | |a uc | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i 236e6674-a7b2-4c99-9a18-29cb1cf7a1fa |s c1d04c28-7aef-456d-a8b2-ea9ed4e83a5f |
| 928 | |l UCX |c UC-Order |i 14261170 | ||
| 927 | |l UCX |c UC-Order |i 10786705 | ||