Hiroshima notes /

Japanese novelist Oe, who won a Nobel Prize in 1994, wrote these searching essays between 1963 and 1965, when he made frequent visits to the rebuilt city of Hiroshima and interviewed survivors. The collection, now reissued on the 50th anniversary of the bombing, examines the moral and political implications of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. Oe explores how A-bomb survivors maintained their dignity despite shattered health resulting from radiation exposure. He writes about the courage of Hiroshima's doctors and nurses who engaged in emergency efforts despite their own afflictions. He also reports on the Japanese movement to ban nuclear weapons, and divulges that medical authorities in Japan suppressed or withheld evidence of the link between radiation exposure and leukemia. The impact of this grim report is enhanced by its calm restraint and the spare, evocative line drawings. (Aug.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved

Reissued with a new introduction by the author for the 50th anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Nobel Prize winner Oe's 19635 ruminations on the Atomic Age are still timely. This collection of essays was first published at a time when Oe ``felt that my career as a writer had reached a stalemate,'' shortly after the birth of his severely retarded son; visiting Hiroshima, he underwent what Oe himself describes as a conversion experience and found new purpose to his career and the strength to deal with his son's medical problems. As he recounts his first trip to Hiroshima, to cover the Ninth World Conference against Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs in 1963, Oe contrasts with dry, understated irony the difficult, painful work of the self-effacing men and women of the medical teams working at Hiroshima with the pettiness of the political squabbles that threatened the conference. Unfortunately, the pieces that follow the initial essay, with Oe returning again to the city, become repetitive and even, regrettably, a bit dull. Moreover, the book needs a more comprehensive update than Oe's brief introduction provides. Disappointing overall, considering who the author is, but the first essay in the collection is essential reading.