Deciding together : bioethics and moral consensus /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Moreno, Jonathan D.
Imprint:New York : Oxford University Press, 1995.
Description:xv, 165 p. : ill. ; 25 cm.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/2388347
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:019509218X (alk. paper)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Review by Choice Review

In this work, Moreno considers the controversies over research ethics consensus, policy, and costs. His philosophical analysis finds overlapping procedural, substantive, descriptive, and prescriptive levels of consensus. There is a review of bioethics accomplishments, failures, politics, and limits of liberalism, including abortion, kidney dialysis, and the Quinlan controversy. Bioethics means social reform; instead of doctors alone making decisions, some are shared by family and patients. Although good for democracy, consensus can be dangerous: the danger underlines the need to know the psychological and sociological dimensions of those forming the consensus. A caveat: Moreno does not mention the vast majority of health care professions; the largest group--nursing--does not appear anywhere in the index. Graduate through professional. H. O. Thompson; University of Pennsylvania

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review