How we believe : the search for God in an age of science /

Shermer (Occidental College) argues that, although people claim to have reasons for believing in God (the top two reasons in his survey were "the appearance of design in the universe" and "personal experience of God"), in fact there are no good reasons. He attempts to back up his claim by discussing and dismissing various arguments for the existence of God, but the discussion is brief (Aquinas gets two and one-half pages, Paul Davies, one paragraph) and superficial (names never mentioned include, among others, William Craig, John Leslie, and Richard Swinburne). However, the real strength of the book lies in its sustained attempt to understand the origin and function of religious belief from a purely naturalistic standpoint. Here the author is on firmer ground. He takes material from a variety of sources--psychology, anthropology, evolutionary theory, and comparative mythology--and pulls it together into a plausible explanation of how religion began and why, even in a scientific age, religious belief is still so widespread. Recommended for upper-division undergraduates through faculty. D. Temple; Roosevelt University

Shermer, who teaches critical thinking at Occidental College and is perhaps best known as the director of the Skeptics Society and publisher of Skeptic magazine, approaches religion not primarily as a delusion to be debunked but as a phenomenon to be explained. Shermer wonders why religious belief, traditional theistic belief in particular, remains widespread in contemporary America, confounding expectations that progress in science and technology should bring a corresponding decline in faith. One way to discover why people believe is to ask them, and Shermer has compiled original survey data to support his analysis. One noteworthy finding is that, although theists tend to explain their own faith in rational terms (e.g., observing design in nature or a pattern of God's activity in daily life), they explain the theistic beliefs of "most other people" primarily in emotional or pragmatic terms (e.g., faith brings comfort and hope). Shermer maintains that while believers' first-person awareness is misleading, their third-person perspective gets it right: religion can be explained quite adequately in functional terms. He reviews a range of theories from anthropology, evolutionary psychology and cognitive science that analyze religion as a means to social harmony or psychological stability. Although Shermer's arguments will probably not be decisive for debates between nonbelievers and believers (who generally agree that religion has strong pragmatic benefits), both will be able to appreciate this readable and generally fair-minded treatment of a subject that often provokes contentious dispute. (Oct.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved