| Summary: | This study intends to show that the ascription of many shortcomings or obscurities to Aristotle is due to the persistent misinterpetation of key notions in his works, including anachronistic perceptions of statement making.In the first volume Aristotles semantics is culled from the Organon. The second volume presents Aristotles ontology of the sublunar world, and pays special attention to his strategy of argument in light of his semantic views.The reconstruction of the semantic models that come forward as genuinely Aristotelian can give a new impetus to the study of Aristotelian philosophic and semantic thought.
|
|---|
