Eratt, W. (1700). Anabaptism considered: Wherein the chief objections of that sect against infant-baptism, and the manner of baptizing by aspersion, or sprinkling, are fairly stated and answered; and reasons given why dipping is not to be taken as the essential or necessary mode of administration. In a familiar letter of advice to a parishioner inclining that way. By William Eratt, M.A. and minister of Hatfield near Doncaster. printed by W.B. for A. and J. Churchill. And for Robert Clark in York.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationEratt, William. Anabaptism Considered: Wherein the Chief Objections of That Sect Against Infant-baptism, and the Manner of Baptizing by Aspersion, or Sprinkling, Are Fairly Stated and Answered; and Reasons Given Why Dipping Is Not to Be Taken as the Essential or Necessary Mode of Administration. In a Familiar Letter of Advice to a Parishioner Inclining That Way. By William Eratt, M.A. and Minister of Hatfield Near Doncaster. London: printed by W.B. for A. and J. Churchill. And for Robert Clark in York, 1700.
MLA (8th ed.) CitationEratt, William. Anabaptism Considered: Wherein the Chief Objections of That Sect Against Infant-baptism, and the Manner of Baptizing by Aspersion, or Sprinkling, Are Fairly Stated and Answered; and Reasons Given Why Dipping Is Not to Be Taken as the Essential or Necessary Mode of Administration. In a Familiar Letter of Advice to a Parishioner Inclining That Way. By William Eratt, M.A. and Minister of Hatfield Near Doncaster. printed by W.B. for A. and J. Churchill. And for Robert Clark in York, 1700.