Revenue and the fiscal impact of trade liberalization : the case of Niger /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Zafar, Ali.
Imprint:Washington, D.C. : World Bank, Africa Technical Families, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management 3, 2005.
Description:27 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Language:English
Series:Policy research working paper ; 3500
Policy research working papers ; 3500.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/5586171
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:World Bank. Africa Technical Families. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management 3.
Notes:"February 2005."
Includes bibliographical references (p. 21-22).
Also available on the World Wide Web.
Summary:"Using data collected during several missions, Zafar finds that the principal reasons for low revenue mobilization are (1) the adverse fiscal impact of trade liberalization, (2) the defiscalization of agriculture in the 1970s, (3) the collapse of the uranium boom in the 1980s, and (4) the poor record of the VAT in mobilizing revenue. The large reduction in tariffs during the 1980s and 1990s in the context of structural adjustment programs and West African regional integration initiatives had adverse effects on trade tax revenue during the period 1980--2003. But higher import levels after 1994 succeeded in partially mitigating the revenue losses. The experience of Niger shows that without accompanying macroeconomic policies, parallel improvements in tax and customs administration, and success in mobilizing domestic taxes, most notably the VAT, trade reform can have adverse fiscal consequences. Using a SMART model partial equilibrium analysis developed by UNCTAD for researchers and negotiators at multilateral trade rounds, the author simulated three different tariff shocks to test the fiscal and trade implications of additional trade liberalization in Niger. First, the preferred tariff regime in terms of overall fiscal and job creation impact was the harmonized Swiss formula in contrast to a 10 and 15 percent uniform tariff. Second, a possible Regional Economic Partnership Agreement (REPA) between the European Union and l'Union ⁹conomique et Monťaire Ouest-Africaine (UEMOA) by 2015 that would abolish duties on EU imports to the UEMOA countries would have negative fiscal effects on Niger of more than 1 percent of GDP, positive effects on trade creation of about 1.5 percent of GDP, and ambiguous effects on local industry. While there will be some welfare gains for consumers and importers from lower import tariffs and the possibility of trade creation, the fiscal losses and adjustment costs would be significant, particularly in the machinery and transport sectors. Third, there are asymmetric gains and losses from regional integration and tariff changes, and a 10 percent uniform tariff would have the greatest impact on Benin and Senegal and some impact on Niger and Togo. In sum, further trade liberalization in Niger will have significant fiscal costs, partially offset by trade creation through increased imports. This paper--a product of Poverty Reduction and Economic Management 3, Africa Technical Families--is part of a larger effort in the region to understand the reasons for low resource mobilization"--Abstract.

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 a 4500
001 5586171
005 20050803174600.0
008 050304s2005 dcua b i000 0 eng
003 ICU
035 |a (OCoLC)58047818 
040 |a DJB  |c DJB  |d UtOrBLW 
043 |a f-ng--- 
049 |a CGUA 
090 |a HG3881.5.W57  |b P63 no.3500 
100 1 |a Zafar, Ali.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2003101340,http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2003101340  |1 http://viaf.org/viaf/277535540 
245 1 0 |a Revenue and the fiscal impact of trade liberalization :  |b the case of Niger /  |c Ali Zafar. 
260 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b World Bank, Africa Technical Families, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management 3,  |c 2005. 
300 |a 27 p. :  |b ill. ;  |c 28 cm. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/txt 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/n 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/nc 
490 1 |a Policy research working paper ;  |v 3500 
500 |a "February 2005." 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 21-22). 
520 3 |a "Using data collected during several missions, Zafar finds that the principal reasons for low revenue mobilization are (1) the adverse fiscal impact of trade liberalization, (2) the defiscalization of agriculture in the 1970s, (3) the collapse of the uranium boom in the 1980s, and (4) the poor record of the VAT in mobilizing revenue. The large reduction in tariffs during the 1980s and 1990s in the context of structural adjustment programs and West African regional integration initiatives had adverse effects on trade tax revenue during the period 1980--2003. But higher import levels after 1994 succeeded in partially mitigating the revenue losses. The experience of Niger shows that without accompanying macroeconomic policies, parallel improvements in tax and customs administration, and success in mobilizing domestic taxes, most notably the VAT, trade reform can have adverse fiscal consequences. Using a SMART model partial equilibrium analysis developed by UNCTAD for researchers and negotiators at multilateral trade rounds, the author simulated three different tariff shocks to test the fiscal and trade implications of additional trade liberalization in Niger. First, the preferred tariff regime in terms of overall fiscal and job creation impact was the harmonized Swiss formula in contrast to a 10 and 15 percent uniform tariff. Second, a possible Regional Economic Partnership Agreement (REPA) between the European Union and l'Union ⁹conomique et Monťaire Ouest-Africaine (UEMOA) by 2015 that would abolish duties on EU imports to the UEMOA countries would have negative fiscal effects on Niger of more than 1 percent of GDP, positive effects on trade creation of about 1.5 percent of GDP, and ambiguous effects on local industry. While there will be some welfare gains for consumers and importers from lower import tariffs and the possibility of trade creation, the fiscal losses and adjustment costs would be significant, particularly in the machinery and transport sectors. Third, there are asymmetric gains and losses from regional integration and tariff changes, and a 10 percent uniform tariff would have the greatest impact on Benin and Senegal and some impact on Niger and Togo. In sum, further trade liberalization in Niger will have significant fiscal costs, partially offset by trade creation through increased imports. This paper--a product of Poverty Reduction and Economic Management 3, Africa Technical Families--is part of a larger effort in the region to understand the reasons for low resource mobilization"--Abstract. 
530 |a Also available on the World Wide Web. 
650 0 |a Free trade  |z Niger. 
650 0 |a Tariff  |z Niger. 
650 0 |a Tax revenue estimating  |z Niger. 
650 7 |a Free trade.  |2 fast  |0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst00933944 
650 7 |a Tariff.  |2 fast  |0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst01143154 
650 7 |a Tax revenue estimating.  |2 fast  |0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst01143852 
651 7 |a Niger.  |2 fast  |0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst01205480 
710 2 |a World Bank.  |b Africa Technical Families.  |b Poverty Reduction and Economic Management 3.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002033391,http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002033391  |1 http://viaf.org/viaf/132862025 
830 0 |a Policy research working papers ;  |v 3500. 
856 4 1 |u http://econ.worldbank.org/working_papers/41237/ 
901 |a Analytic 
903 |a HeVa 
903 |a Hathi 
929 |a cat 
999 f f |i a1d48e89-6f11-539c-932f-c40d31e19bee  |s 995f4efe-5832-5be4-afe1-cd49a5933841 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a HG3879.P6 no.3500  |l ASR  |c ASR-JRLASR  |i 4837407 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a HG3879.P6 no.3500  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://econ.worldbank.org/working_papers/41237/  |g ebooks  |i 7338048 
927 |t Library of Congress classification  |a HG3879.P6 no.3500  |l ASR  |c ASR-JRLASR  |g Analytic  |b A68728467a  |i 7822036