A lawyer's handbook for enforcing foreign judgments in the United States and abroad /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Lutz, Robert E.
Imprint:Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Description:xi, 630 p. ; 27 cm.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/6228603
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Varying Form of Title:Enforcing foreign judgments in the United States and abroad
ISBN:0521858747 (hardback)
9780521858748 (hardback)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (p. 586-617) and index.
Table of Contents:
  • Preface
  • Acknowledgments and Dedication
  • Introduction
  • Part 1. Enforcing Foreign Country Judgments in the United States
  • I. Overview
  • II. Phase One: Before Recognition
  • A. Choosing a Jurisdiction/Locating Assets
  • 1. Jurisdiction and Venue
  • 2. Choice of Forum: Federal or State Court
  • a. Generally
  • b. Federal or State Court?
  • c. Burden of Proof
  • d. Defenses
  • 3. Choice of Venue: Defenses
  • 4. Preemption
  • B. Evidentiary Requirements: Copy of the Judgment
  • 1. Authentication
  • a. Simplified Authentication
  • b. Procedure
  • 1. Obtaining Authentication
  • 2. Seal
  • 3. Translations
  • 4. Proof of Service
  • III. Phase Two: Converting the Judgment
  • A. Conversion Methods Under the Recognition Act
  • 1. Conversion Under the Uniform Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act: Introduction
  • 2. Conversion by Common Law Action
  • 3. Conversion by Registration
  • a. The California and New York Exceptions
  • B. The Complaint
  • C. Selected Key Provisions of the Recognition Act
  • 1. Conclusiveness Requirement
  • a. Plaintiff
  • b. Defendant
  • c. Mandatory Non-Recognition
  • d. Permissive Non-Recognition
  • 2. Permissive Non-Recognition: Defenses and Strategies
  • a. Sufficient Notice
  • b. Service Under the Hague Convention
  • c. Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
  • d. Inconvenient Forum
  • 3. Default Judgments and Foreign Long-Arm Statutes
  • a. Default Judgments
  • b. Foreign Long-Arm or Exorbitant Jurisdiction Statutes
  • 4. Non-Judicial Dispute Resolution Clauses
  • 5. Public Policy
  • a. Generally
  • b. Combination with Other Defenses
  • c. Corrupt Judicial System
  • 6. Parallel Proceedings
  • a. Res Judicata/Collateral Estoppel
  • b. Rules and Proposed Strategies
  • c. American Bar Association Proposal
  • 7. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Fraud
  • 8. Reciprocity
  • D. Other Conversion Methods
  • 1. Common Law Recognition
  • 2. Other Recognition Statutes
  • 3. New Complaint
  • 4. Action for Conversion in Other Jurisdictions: Strategy
  • E. Currency of Damages
  • 1. Generally
  • 2. "Breach Day" and "Judgment Day" Rules
  • 3. Uniform Foreign-Money Claims Act
  • a. Pleadings
  • b. Defenses
  • IV. Phase Three: Executing a Converted Judgment in U.S. Courts
  • A. Plaintiff: Locating and Freezing Assets
  • B. Collecting the Judgment
  • C. Filing Satisfaction of Judgment
  • V. Conclusion
  • Bibliography
  • Instruments, Laws, and Other Materials
  • Part 2. Enforcement of Judgments Abroad
  • I. Overview
  • II. How to Identify and Select Foreign Counsel
  • A. Sources for Identifying Foreign Counsel
  • B. Is Foreign Counsel Competent?
  • C. What Will Foreign Representation Cost?
  • III. Documentation for Enforcement
  • A. The Hague Legalization Convention
  • B. Traditional Certification
  • C. Evidence of Judgment
  • D. Other Documentation and Information
  • IV. Understanding Foreign Enforcement Frameworks
  • A. General
  • B. Foreign Enforcement Frameworks
  • 1. Generally
  • 2. Common Law Countries: Action for Recognition (United Kingdom, British Commonwealth, and United States)
  • a. Statutory Approach
  • b. Documentary Requirements
  • 3. Civil Law Exequatur (France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Latin America)
  • a. No Reexamination on the Merits
  • b. Documentary Requirements
  • c. Exclusive Jurisdiction of the Recognizing Court
  • d. Enforcement in Trial Courts
  • e. The German Example
  • 4. Treaty Approach (European Union, Latin America, Nordic Countries, Austria)
  • a. Uniform Substantive Law of Recognition (Bustamante Code)
  • b. Modern Streamlined Procedures (The Brussels Regulation)
  • c. Exclusive Treaties
  • 1. Generally
  • 2. Denmark and the United States
  • 3. Austria and the United States
  • 4. Islamic Countries
  • d. Supplemental Treaties
  • e. Treatises vis-a-vis U.S. Judgments
  • 5. East Asian Approach (Japan, Korea, and Taiwan)
  • a. Uniform Statutes
  • V. Conclusion
  • Bibliography
  • Instruments, Laws, and Other Materials
  • Part 3. The Future of Enforcing Foreign Judgments
  • I. Introduction
  • II. Hague Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements
  • A. Moving Toward a Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgment Enforcement
  • 1. The U.S.-U.K. Convention Draft
  • 2. The Hague Convention
  • B. The 1999 Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments
  • C. The 2001 Draft Convention
  • D. Downscaling the Scope of the Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention
  • E. Current Status: Main Provisions and Major Issues of the 2005 Final Convention
  • 1. Main Obligations and Exceptions of the 2005 Final Convention
  • 2. Problems and Issues That Emerged from the Draft Convention
  • III. International Jurisdiction and Judgments Project of the American Law Institute
  • A. Introduction
  • B. General Provisions of the American Law Institute Project
  • C. The Mandatory and Permissive Bases of Non-Recognition and the Black List of Jurisdictional Bases
  • D. Major Issues and Problem Areas in the International Jurisdiction and Judgments Project
  • IV. Revision of the Uniform Foreign-Money Judgment Recognition and Enforcement Act
  • A. The Uniform Act Experience
  • B. Proposed Revisions
  • V. International Trade Flexibility and Enforcing Foreign Judgments
  • VI. Conclusion
  • Bibliography
  • Index