Media argumentation : dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Walton, Douglas N.
Imprint:Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Description:xiii, 386 p. : ill. (some col.) ; 24 cm.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/6621739
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780521876902 (hardback)
0521876907 (hardback)
9780521700306 (pbk.)
0521700302 (pbk.)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (p. 361-372) and index.
Table of Contents:
  • Acknowledgments
  • Introduction
  • 1. Logic, Dialectic, and Rhetoric
  • 1. The Viewpoint of Informal Logic
  • 2. The Old Dialectic of the Greeks
  • 3. The Opposition between Rhetoric and Dialectic
  • 4. Topics and Fallacies
  • 5. Persuasion, Social Influence, and Democracy
  • 6. Argumentation Schemes
  • 7. Basic Practical Reasoning
  • 8. Value-Based Practical Reasoning
  • 9. The Star Trek Example
  • 10. The Aims of Dialectical and Rhetorical Argumentation
  • 2. The Speech Act of Persuasion
  • 1. The Belief-Desire-Intention Approach and the Commitment Approach
  • 2. Basic Components of Persuasion
  • 3. Chaining of Argumentation
  • 4. Types of Dialogue
  • 5. Deliberation
  • 6. Closing of the Deliberation Dialogue
  • 7. Acts of Persuasion, Inducement, and Making a Threat
  • 8. Negotiation Dialogue and Persuasion
  • 9. Relevance and Argument Diagramming
  • 10. The Cognitive Component of Persuasion
  • 11. The New Definition of the Speech Act of Persuasion
  • 3. Propaganda
  • 1. Negative Connotations
  • 2. Public Discourse and Reason
  • 3. Appeal to the People Revisited
  • 4. The Dialectical Viewpoint on Propaganda
  • 5. Persuasion and Propaganda
  • 6. Characteristics of Propaganda
  • 7. Is Propaganda Necessarily Dishonest or Irrational?
  • 8. Openness to Contrary Evidence
  • 9. Deceptiveness and Relevance in Propaganda
  • 10. Evaluating Argumentation in Propaganda
  • 4. Appeals to Fear and Pity
  • 1. Appeals to Fear and Pity in Mass Media
  • 2. Appeals to Fear
  • 3. Appeals to Pity
  • 4. The Respondent-to-Dialogue Problem
  • 5. Simulative Reasoning
  • 6. The Dual Process Model of Persuasion
  • 7. The Structure of Appeals to Fear
  • 8. The Structure of Appeals to Pity
  • 9. Multi-agent Structure of Both Types of Argument
  • 10. When Are Appeals to Fear and Pity Fallacious?
  • 5. Ad Hominem Arguments in Political Discourse
  • 1. Classifying the Types of Ad Hominem Argument
  • 2. The Circumstantial and Other Types
  • 3. Argument from Commitment
  • 4. The Gore Case
  • 5. The Battalino Case
  • 6. Classifying the Argument in the Battalino Case
  • 7. Evaluating the Argument in the Battalino Case
  • 8. Implicature and Innuendo
  • 9. Evaluating the Argument in the Gore Case
  • 10. Evaluating the Arguments Rhetorically and Dialectically
  • 6. Arguments Based on Popular Opinion
  • 1. Influencing the Mass Audience
  • 2. Appeal to Popular Opinion as an Argument
  • 3. Cases in Point
  • 4. The Form of the Argument
  • 5. Fallacious Appeals to Popular Opinion
  • 6. Endoxa in Greek Dialectic
  • 7. Public Opinion as Informed Deliberation
  • 8. A More Careful Basis for Evaluating Cases
  • 9. Viewing the Public as an Agent
  • 10. Evaluating Appeal to Popular Opinion
  • 7. Fallacies and Bias in Public Opinion Polling
  • 1. Definitions and Sampling Surveys
  • 2. Question Wording and Emotive Bias in Polls
  • 3. The Structure of the Question
  • 4. Forcing an Answer
  • 5. Use of Polls by Advocacy Groups
  • 6. The Advent of Deliberative Polling
  • 7. Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions
  • 8. Using Formal Dialectical Models of Argumentation
  • 9. Combining Dialectical and Empirical Methods
  • 10. Conclusion and Summary of Fallacies
  • 8. Persuasive Definitions and Public Policy Arguments
  • 1. Stevenson's Theory of Persuasive Definitions
  • 2. Cases of Public Redefinitions
  • 3. Wider Implications of These Cases
  • 4. Definitions in the New Dialectic
  • 5. Proof of Legitimacy of Persuasive Definitions
  • 6. Argumentation Schemes Relating to Definitions
  • 7. The Speech Act of Defining
  • 8. Evaluating Persuasive Definitions
  • 9. What Should the Rules for Persuasive Definitions Be?
  • 10. Conclusions
  • 9. The Structure of Media Argumentation
  • 1. Rhetoric and Dialectic Reconfigured
  • 2. The Respondent-to-Dialogue Problem Revisited
  • 3. Direct and Indirect Media Argumentation
  • 4. Star Trek: The Rhetorical Dimension
  • 5. Argumentation Strategies
  • 6. Plan Recognition
  • 7. The Solution to the RTD Problem
  • 8. Fifteen Basic Components of Media Argumentation
  • 9. The Persuasion System
  • 10. Computational Dialectics for Rhetorical Invention
  • Bibliography
  • Index