This volume explicitly connects the on-going Methodology Debate within Legal Philosophy to constitutional adjudication in charter systems. By drawing out the implications of this debate and the challenge of giving a proper account of constitutional adjudication in a general theory of law, the study shows how a descriptive, morally and politically neutral legal theory can deal with epistemic uncertainty in a thoroughgoing manner. It also demonstrates the merits of a minimalist version of Legal Positivism with regard to the practical importance of charters in charter systems and societies. Excerpted from Epistemic Uncertainty and Legal Theory by Brian Burge-Hendrix All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.
