Change of position defence /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Bant, Elise.
Imprint:Oxford ; Portland, Or. : Hart Publishing, 2009.
Description:xxviii, 264 p. ; 24 cm.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/7590225
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:1841139653
9781841139654
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Table of Contents:
  • 1. Introduction and Overview
  • A. Introduction
  • B. The Change of Position Defence
  • 1. A Core Case
  • 2. The Four Main Areas of Doubt
  • a. The Reliance Issue
  • b. The Fault Issue
  • c. The Ambit of Operation Issue
  • d. The Rationale Issue
  • C. Underlying Assumptions
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. The Nature of Unjust Enrichment
  • 3. Restitution and Unjust Enrichment
  • 4. A Fusionist Approach
  • D. Methodology and Overview
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Part One Foundations
  • 3. Part Two Definition
  • 4. Part Three Ramifications
  • Part 1. Foundations
  • 2. Lessons from Estoppel by Representation
  • A. Introduction
  • B. Elements of Estoppel by Representation
  • 1. Representation
  • 2. Reliance
  • a. The Meaning of Reliance
  • b. The Role of Reliance as a Causal Requirement
  • c. The Applicable Test of Causation
  • d. Proving Reliance
  • e. A Residual, Evidential Role for the 'But For' Test
  • f. The Normative Significance of Reliance
  • g. Lessons for the Change of Position Defence
  • 3. The 'Reasonableness' Requirement
  • a. The Defendant's Reliance must be Reasonable
  • b. The Standard of Reasonableness and its Relationship to Good Faith
  • c. The Function of the Reasonableness Requirement
  • d. Lessons for the Change of Position Defence
  • 4. Detriment
  • a. The Meaning of Detriment
  • b. The Time for Assessing the Detrimental Change of Position
  • c. Detrimental Changes of Position include Omissions and Non-pecuniary Changes
  • d. The Change of Position must be Irreversible
  • e. Lessons for the Change of Position Defence
  • C. Bars to the Defence
  • 1. Defendant at Fault in Inducing the Representation
  • 2. Defendant in Breach of Duty
  • 3. Illegality
  • D. Conclusion
  • 3. Lessons from the Defence of Payment Over by an Agent
  • A. Introduction
  • B. The Requirement of Payment Over
  • C. Notice
  • D. Bars to the Defence
  • E. Conclusion
  • 4. Lessons from Rescission
  • A. Introduction
  • B. Restitutio in Integrum
  • 1. Rescission and the Requirement of Restitutio in Integrum
  • 2. The Requirement of Counter-restitution
  • a. Rationale
  • b. Elements and Operation
  • c. Application of the Two Claims Approach to Rescission Cases
  • 3. The Defendant's Changes of Position
  • a. Change by Exchange
  • b. Independent Changes in the Received Benefit
  • c. Defendant-instigated Changes of Position
  • 4. The Claimant's Changes of Position
  • a. Independent Changes in the Received Benefit
  • b. Claimant-instigated Changes of Position
  • c. An Irreconcilable Tension?
  • C. Conclusion
  • 1. Rationale
  • 2. Elements
  • 3. Ambit of Operation
  • Part 2. Definition
  • 5. Primary Elements
  • A. Introduction
  • B. Elements
  • 1. A Detrimental Change of Position
  • a. Detriment as 'Disenrichment'
  • b. Detriment as 'Irreversibility'
  • c. The Irreversibility Approach is to be Preferred
  • d. Proving the Irreversible Change of Position
  • 2. Causation
  • a. Introduction
  • b. But-for Causation in Cases of Independent Changes of Position
  • c. Good Faith in Cases of Independent Changes of Position
  • d. Reliance in Cases of Defendant-instigated Changes of Position
  • e. Reliance must be Reasonable
  • f. Anticipatory Changes of Position
  • g. Proving Causation
  • 3. The Impact of Third Parties
  • C. Conclusion
  • 6. Fault as a Bar to the Defence
  • A. Introduction
  • B. Wrongdoers
  • C. Duress and Undue Influence
  • D. The Innocent Inducer
  • E. Illegality and Legal Stultification
  • F. Fault in the Defendant's Change of Position
  • G. Conclusion
  • 7. Ambit of Operation
  • A. Introduction
  • B. Application to Claims in Unjust Enrichment
  • 1. Mistake
  • 2. Duress and Undue Influence
  • 3. Failure of Consideration
  • 4. No Intention to Benefit
  • 5. Policy-motivated Unjust Factors
  • 6. Cases of Proprietary Restitution
  • C. Application to Claims outside Unjust Enrichment
  • D. Conclusion
  • 8. Rationale
  • A. Introduction
  • B. Disenrichment
  • C. Autonomy
  • D. Security of Receipt
  • E. A Harm-based Rationale
  • F. A Mixed Rationale of Protection and Prophylaxis
  • G. Conclusion
  • 9. Conclusion
  • Part 3. Ramifications
  • 10. Ramifications
  • A. Introduction
  • B. Estoppel by Representation
  • C. Payment Over and Ministerial Receipt
  • D. Restitutio in Integrum
  • E. Good Consideration
  • F. Bona Fide Purchase
  • G. Statutory Change of Position Defences
  • H. Conclusion