|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000007a 4500 |
| 001 |
7848556 |
| 005 |
20130320140200.0 |
| 008 |
091215s2009 enk b 001 0 eng |
| 003 |
ICU |
| 010 |
|
|
|a 2009674919
|
| 015 |
|
|
|a GBA964963
|2 bnb
|
| 016 |
7 |
|
|a 015302466
|2 Uk
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780956205209 (hbk.)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0956205208 (hbk.)
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)421807442
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a yb2714795
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a UKM
|b eng
|c UKM
|d DLC
|d BTCTA
|d YDXCP
|d HLS
|d BWX
|d CUY
|d LHU
|d UKMGB
|
| 042 |
|
|
|a lccopycat
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a CGUA
|
| 050 |
0 |
0 |
|a ZA4482
|b .D35 2009
|
| 082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 030.285
|2 22
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Dalby, Andrew,
|d 1947-
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n95019019
|1 http://viaf.org/viaf/270385154
|
| 245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The world and Wikipedia :
|b how we are editing reality /
|c Andrew Dalby.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Somerset :
|b Siduri,
|c 2009.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 256 p. ;
|c 24 cm.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/txt
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a unmediated
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/n
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a volume
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/nc
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (p. 241-246) and indexes.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a "Take any article on Wikipedia. Who wrote it? Where did it come from? Now take a closer look at those unconvincing, badly written sentences in the middle. Why did someone add them? How long will it be before someone else deletes them? And how many people will have read them before they are removed?
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Five years ago such questions didn't matter; Wikipedia was one source among many, and no one took it very seriously. Two years ago they hardly mattered, because the newspapers said Wikipedia couldn't be trusted, and there was always a more 'reliable' source to check later.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a But suddenly, these questions really do matter. With all its nonsense, its illiteracy and its unreliability, Wikipedia is currently the eighth most visited site on the web. Whatever they say, most people rely on it most of the time. Those other sources won't be around much longer, and Wikipedia will be the best there is. But is it good enough to rule the world of knowledge? And how big will it be ten years from now?"--pub. desc.
|
| 630 |
0 |
0 |
|a Wikipedia.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2008072801
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a User-generated content.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2007005697
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a User-generated content
|x Social aspects.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a User-generated content
|x Psychological aspects.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Electronic encyclopedias.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh95009430
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Electronic encyclopedias
|x Social aspects.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Electronic encyclopedias
|x Psychological aspects.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Knowledge, Sociology of.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85072731
|
| 630 |
0 |
7 |
|a Wikipedia.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst01795979
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1795979
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Electronic encyclopedias.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst00907189
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Knowledge, Sociology of.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst00988190
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a User-generated content.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst01743487
|
| 903 |
|
|
|a HeVa
|
| 929 |
|
|
|a cat
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 506c6ac9-f0dc-56da-ad1f-9686eed056d2
|s 7c75fa54-02fa-5140-adbe-157a319f2f91
|
| 928 |
|
|
|t Library of Congress classification
|a ZA4482 .D35 2009
|l JRL
|c JRL-Gen
|i 5516564
|
| 927 |
|
|
|t Library of Congress classification
|a ZA4482 .D35 2009
|l JRL
|c JRL-Gen
|e DOWL
|b 092312540
|i 8672023
|
