Imperative inheritance law in a late-modern society : five perspectives /
Saved in:
Imprint: | Antwerp ; Oxford : Intersentia, 2009. |
---|---|
Description: | xv, 224 p. ; 24 cm. |
Language: | English |
Series: | European family law series ; 26 European family law series ; 26. |
Subject: | |
Format: | Print Book |
URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/7904261 |
Table of Contents:
- Preface
- Introduction and Objectives
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Universality of succession law
- 3. Ways in which property is inherited
- 4. Symbolic function of the law
- 5. Choices in our actual inheritance law
- I. Choices within the intestate inheritance law
- 1. Ratio legis for the (reduction of) intestate inheritance law (to patrimonial rights)
- 2. Background perspective - individualism and private property
- 3. Founding principles
- 4. Legal translation of these founding principles
- 5. Consequences
- 6. The idea of intestate inheritance law as the tacit will of the deceased
- II. Choices within the testamentary inheritance law
- III. Choices within the imperative inheritance law
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Imperative inheritance law in a comparative law approach
- a. First type - law of forced heirship
- b. Second type - mandatory asset claims
- c. No mandatory succession law
- 6. Contestation of the choices made by our inheritance law
- 7. Multidisciplinary International Seminar on Imperative Inheritance Law
- I. Aim
- II. Discussion proposals
- 8. Conclusions
- Perspective 1. Legal Anthropology
- 1. Introduction
- 2. What is legal anthropology?
- 3. Imperative inheritance law: ethnographic appraisal of 'discriminatory' practices
- I. Women's lesser rights of inheritance
- II. Women's 'exclusion' from independent ownership of land versus other avenues of obtaining property
- 4. Inheritance Laws and Islam
- I. Islamic inheritance law. A succinct presentation of the main basic principles
- II. Practice: Estate planning and renunciation of specific fractional shares
- III. Addressing Islamic inheritance law through international human rights standards
- 5. Conclusion: Either your Culture or your Inheritance Rights?
- Perspective 2. Legal History A History of the Law of Succession, in Particular in the Southern Netherlands/Belgium
- 1. The importance of the law of succession
- 2. The diversity of the law of succession in the Southern Netherlands before 1795
- 3. In spite of the diversity, some 'general principles of the law of succession' can be found
- 4. The rest of the law has to follow the dictates of legal devolution
- I. Limited possibilities for wills
- II. Debts were no impediment
- III. Restrictions on gifts and sales
- IV. The mildness of the tax collector
- V. Ransom
- VI. One exception: the rights of the surviving spouse
- 5. The old law of succession was not static
- 6. The law of succession as the best weapon of the French revolution
- 7. Napoleon: tempering the Revolution
- 8. After Napoleon: lethargy
- 9. The future: is freedom possible?
- Perspective 3. Sociology of law
- 1. Introductory comments
- 2. Parallel ideal-types
- 3. Socio-cultural transformations
- 4. Recapitulation and conclusion
- Perspective 4. Law and Economics The Post Mortem Homo Economicus: What Does He Tell Us?
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Explaining inheritance
- 3. Legitimate share or free will
- 4. Regulating free bequest
- 5. The state as the Heir: Inheritance Tax
- 6. Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Perspective 5. Comparative Law - The Netherlands
- 1. The battle pertaining to new inheritance law (1947-2003)
- 2. The arguments for upholding the legitimate portion
- I. The family tie
- II. Prevention of disputes and problems
- III. Maintenance
- IV. Sense of justice or juridical view
- V. Incidental need
- VI. Tradition and comparative law
- 3. The arguments for abolishing the legitimate portion
- I. The arguments in favour of the legitimate portion are not convincing
- II. It's a free country
- III. Justice
- IV. Safeguarding of the financial provision
- V. Simplicity
- 4. Other statutory rights
- I. Freedom of will making
- II. Entitlements of imperative law
- III. Critical remarks regarding the 'other statutory rights'
- 5. Forfeiture of the right to inherit (passive)
- 6. Forfeiture of the right to dispose of by will (active)
- 7. Conclusion
- Perspective 5. Comparative Law - United Kingdom
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Common law European legal systems
- 3. What is a property right?
- 4. Patrimony and estate
- 5. Administration of estates
- 6. Freedom of testation
- I. Land
- II. Chattels
- III. Intestacy
- IV. Twentieth century reform
- V. Scotland and the Channel Islands
- 7. The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
- I. Introduction
- II. Domicile of the deceased
- III. Time limit for bringing a claim
- IV. Who can bring a claim?
- V. The court's approach
- VI. The tests for reasonable financial provision
- VII. What is maintenance?
- VIII. What are the factors the court considers to ascertain 'reasonable provision'?
- IX. Common law and civil law compared
- X. Claims by surviving spouses/civil partners
- XI. Ancillary relief cases
- XII. Impact of the ancillary relief cases on 1975 Act claims
- XIII. Claims by adult children
- A. Evolution
- B. Myers v Myers
- C. Gold v Curtis
- D. Land v Estate of Land
- E. Garland v Morris
- XIV. Anti-avoidance
- XIV. Judicial attitudes to the legislation
- 8. The impact of the legislation
- 9. Conclusion
- Perspective 5. Comparative Law - Belgium
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Intestate Inheritance Law
- 3. Remarks regarding children
- 4. Imperative rights for descendents and ascendants
- 5. Intestate rights for the surviving spouse
- 6. Remarks about this matrimonial property
- 7. Imperative rights for the surviving spouse
- 8. Intestate rights of the surviving partner
- 9. Imperative inheritance rights now
- 10. Imperative inheritance rights in a future law
- 11. By way of conclusion
- Perspective 5. Comparative Law - Germany
- 1. Concept
- 2. Historical development
- 3. Constitutional protection
- I. Constitutional approach: Articles 6 and 14 GG
- II. The Constitutional Court's decision of 2000
- III. The Constitutional Court's decision of 2005
- 4. Holders
- I. Descendants, parents, surviving spouse and registered partner
- II. Condition: exclusion of hereditary succession
- 5. Calculation of the Pflichtteil
- I. Calculation of the Pflichtteilsquote
- A. Descendants
- B. Parents
- C. Surviving spouse and registered partner
- II. Calculation of the value of the Pflichtteil
- Claims for the protection of the Pflichtteil
- I. Right to information
- II. Claim for the remainder of the compulsory portion (Pflichtteilsrestanspruch)
- III. Deduction (Anrechnung)
- IV. Right to a supplement to the compulsory portion (Pflichtteilsergänzungsanspruch)
- 7. Forfeiture of the Pflichtteil
- I. Loss of the right of succession
- A. Unworthiness
- B. Introduction of divorce proceedings
- C. Renouncement of the right of succession or of the compulsory portion
- D. Renouncement of the estate
- II. Deprivation by the testator
- III. Limitations ex bona mente
- 8. Prescription
- 9. The future of the compulsory portion
- Perspective 5. Comparative Law - France
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Les apports de la loi du 3 décembre 2001: faveur au conjoint survivant
- I. Droit du conjoint survivant sur le logement de la famille
- II. Autres droits successoraux du conjoint survivant: l'apparition d'une réserve en l'absence de descendant du défunt
- 3. La loi du 23 juin 2006: une réforme favorisant l'autonomie de la volonté
- I. Disparition du droit de réserve héréditaire des ascendants
- II. De la nullité à la validité contrôlée des pactes sur succession future
- III. Clarifications apportées par la loi du 23 juin 2006
- IV. Régime des restitutions
- V. Admission des donations-partages transgénérationnelles
- VI. Modernisation des opérations de partage
- 4. Conclusion
- Conclusions - Towards an open and Flexible Imperative Inheritance Law
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Four preliminary perspectives
- I. Anthropology of law
- II. History of law
- III. Sociology of law
- IV. Law and economics
- 3. Comparative legal perspective
- I. From context to law, and from "institution" to multiple "institutes"
- II. Forced heirship
- III. Intermediate position: forced heirship limited to some type of assets
- IV. Potential inheritance claim
- 1. England
- 2. Other countries
- V. Legal certainty vs. flexibility
- 4. Openness and flexibility