Review by Choice Review
Using extensive primary and secondary sources, former USAF military historian Tucker (Cathy Williams: From Slave to Buffalo Soldier, CH, Oct'02, 40-1133) argues that no heroic "last stand" defense by the besieged soldiers in the Alamo ever occurred. The Mexican army led by General Santa Ana overran the Alamo on March 6, 1836, in 20 minutes in a predawn surprise assault. Denied manpower and munitions by the Texas government, most Alamo defenders died outside the Alamo grounds fleeing for their lives. The last-stand myth persists today because historians disregard Mexican primary sources, a neglect Tucker attributes to anti-Mexican racial bias. This historical distortion of the Alamo story provided the "moral, righteous justification for discrimination and acquisition of Tejano and Mexican lands." Needless repetition weakens an otherwise interesting, detailed study. One map and several black-and-white illustrations. Summing Up: Recommended. All levels/libraries. L. J. Quintanilla Lone Star College
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Library Journal Review
Over the years, a few scholars and history buffs have indicated that some aspects of the Alamo story may not have occurred as commonly believed. Now military historian Tucker (Burnside's Bridge) has used letters and reports of Mexican officers written immediately after the skirmish to show that almost everything we know about the fight at the Alamo is a myth. He explains that what drew Americans to Texas was cheap land that could be used for plantations worked by slaves, indicating that the Texas independence movement was designed to preserve slavery in Texas against a Mexican government that wanted to abolish the institution. Tucker demonstrates that the battle of the Alamo was in reality a 20-minute predawn skirmish of no military significance, one that literally caught the militarily inexperienced and overconfident defenders asleep in their beds. When aroused, they resorted to their natural instincts and fled (hence the title here), only to be cut down by Mexican cavalry. Verdict As Tucker provides long-overdue corrections to the Alamo story unknown to most readers, this should be read by scholars and lay readers alike despite much unnecessary repetition and lots of heavy-handed prose. A better editor could have turned this into a far better book. Recommended nonetheless for its corrective value.-Stephen H. Peters, Northern Michigan Univ. Lib., Marquette (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Choice Review
Review by Library Journal Review
