Swift and Pope : satirists in dialogue /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Griffin, Dustin.
Imprint:New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Description:xiv, 260 p. : ill., facsims. ; 24 cm.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8124536
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780521761239 (hardback)
0521761239 (hardback)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Summary:"Swift and Pope were lifelong friends and fellow satirists with shared literary sensibilities. But there were significant differences - demographic, psychological, and literary - between them: an Anglican and a Roman Catholic, an Irishman and an Englishman, one deeply committed to politically engaged poetry, and the other reluctant to engage in partisanship and inclined to distinguish poetry from politics. Dustin Griffin argues that we need to pay more attention to those differences, which both authors recognised and discussed. Their letters, poems, and satires can be read as stages in an ongoing conversation or satiric dialogue: each often wrote for the other, sometimes addressing him directly, sometimes emulating or imitating. In some sense, each was constantly replying to the other. From their lifelong dialogue emerges not only the extraordinary affection and admiration they felt for each other, but also the occasional irritation and resentment that kept them both together and apart"--
Review by Choice Review

Griffin (emer., NYU) offers five lengthy essays, each focusing on a particular period of dialogue between Jonathan Swift (1667-1745) and Alexander Pope (1688-1744), starting in 1710 ("The Four Last Years of Queen Anne") and continuing until Pope's death. The book as a whole examines the effect that this lifelong dialogue had on each satirist. Whereas earlier studies explored either the writers' shared sensibility or their divergences, Griffin looks at how, as "satirists in dialogue" with one another, they defined their self-perception, and he argues that "to read them in isolation is in part to misread them." He explores crucial areas of conversation and correspondence along with obvious poems-as-response and collaborative authorship and editorship; he also makes brief forays into other subjects, for example, book history. Griffin draws loosely on theories of dialogic writing without much explicit theorizing. He also mentions various critical consensuses and trends, but though he does this with general accuracy he does not substantiate and document these claims in footnotes or bibliography--a significant weakness of the book. Nevertheless, by exploring the tendency of 18th-century texts to have multiple, even anonymous authors and to inhabit explicitly responsive contexts, Griffin offers crucial pre-Romantic contexts for both authors. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. C. S. Vilmar Salisbury University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review