Analytic versus continental : arguments on the methods and value of philosophy /
Saved in:
| Author / Creator: | Chase, James, 1969- |
|---|---|
| Imprint: | MontreĢal : McGill-Queen's University Press, c2010. |
| Description: | viii, 294 p. ; 24 cm. |
| Language: | English |
| Subject: | |
| Format: | Print Book |
| URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8309830 |
| Summary: | Throughout much of the twentieth century, the relationship between the disciplines of analytic and continental philosophy has been one of disinterest, caution, or hostility. Recent debates in philosophy have highlighted some of the similarities between the two approaches and even envisaged a post-continental and post-analytic philosophy. Opening with a history of key encounters between philosophers of opposing camps since the late-nineteenth century - from Frege and Husserl to Derrida and Searle - Analytic versus Continental goes on to explore in detail the main methodological differences between the two approaches. |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | viii, 294 p. ; 24 cm. |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9780773538078 0773538070 9780773538085 0773538089 |
