European aestheticism and Spanish American modernismo : artist protagonists and the philosophy of art for art's sake /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Comfort, Kelly, 1975-
Imprint:Basingstoke ; New Y ork, NY : Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Description:vii, 180 p. ; 23 cm.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8533043
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780230278097 (hbk.)
0230278094 (hbk.)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (p. 163-171) and index.
Summary:This study examines the changing role of art and artist during the turn-of-the-century period, offering a consideration of the multiple dichotomies of art and life, aesthetics and economics, production and consumption, and centre and periphery.
Review by Choice Review

For late-19th- and early-20th-century European and Spanish American writers adhering to the "art for art's sake" credo, art took on the trappings of religion. Style and form are paramount. Life imitates art. Comfort (School of Modern Languages, Georgia Institute of Technology) goes beyond the expansive coverage of the modernistas in Anibal Gonzalez's A Companion to Spanish American Modernismo (CH, Jun'08, 45-5451) by linking writings of Jose Asuncion Silva, Ruben Dario, Manuel Gutierrez Najera, and Julian del Casal to those of three of their European counterparts--Oscar Wilde, J.-K. Huysmans, and Thomas Mann--and identifying numerous instances of borrowings and mutual influences. Despite the elitist and escapist tendencies of both movements, each contained elements of social and political engagement, especially in prose texts, where writers reacted negatively to the crass materialism and commercialism of bourgeois culture and a market economy that converted art into a commodity. Spanish American authors, in the guise of aesthete/dandy/flaneur, often attempted to fashion themselves into works of art; however, since they lacked the accoutrements of European modernity, they produced results that were more derivative than original. This comparative study is a solid example of contemporary transatlantic scholarship. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. M. S. Arrington Jr. University of Mississippi

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review