Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act
Saved in:
| Imprint: | Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Description: | 1 online resource (484 p.) : digital, PDF file(s). |
| Language: | English |
| Subject: | |
| Format: | E-Resource Book |
| URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8838176 |
Table of Contents:
- 1. Judicial Reasoning and the Human Rights Act 1998
- Part I. The Interpretation of the Human Rights Act 1998
- 2. The System of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act: The View from the Outside
- 3. Aspiration or Foundation? The Status of Strasbourg Jurisprudence and the 'Convention Rights' in Domestic Law
- 4. Institutional Roles and Meanings of 'Compatibility' under the Human Rights Act 1998
- 5. Choosing between Sections 3 and 4 Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Reasoning after Ghaidan v Mendoza
- 6. Clarity postponed? Horizontal Effect after Campbell and Re.
- 7. The Standard of Judicial Review and Legal Reasoning after the Human Rights Act
- 8. Principles of Deference under the Human Rights Act
- Part II. The Human Rights Act and Substantive Law
- 9. The Common Law, Privacy and the Convention
- 10. Judicial Reasoning in Clashing Rights Cases
- 11. Family Law and the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Restraint or Revolution?
- 12. Article 14: A Protector, Not a Prosecutor
- 13. Criminal Procedure, The Presumption of Innocence and Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act
- 14. Concluding remarks