Hindu and Buddhist ideas in dialogue : self and no-self /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Imprint:Surrey : Ashgate, [2012]
©2012
Description:vii, 255 pages ; 24 cm.
Language:English
Series:Dialogues in South Asian traditions: religion, philosophy, literature and history
Dialogues in south Asian traditions.
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8849017
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Kuznetsova, Irina (Doctor of philosophy), editor of compilation.
Ganeri, Jonardon, editor of compilation.
Ram-Prasad, Chakravarthi, editor of compilation.
ISBN:9781409443544 (hardcover : alk. paper)
140944354X (hardcover : alk. paper)
9781409443551 (ebook)
1409443558 (ebook)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages [231]-246) and index.
Summary:"The debates between various Buddhist and Hindu philosophical systems about the existence, definition and nature of self, occupy a central place in the history of Indian philosophy and religion. These debates concern various issues: what 'self' means, whether the self can be said to exist at all, arguments that can substantiate any position on this question, how the ordinary reality of individual persons can be explained, and the consequences of each position. At a time when comparable issues are at the forefront of contemporary Western philosophy, in both analytic and continental traditions (as well as in their interaction), these classical and medieval Indian debates widen and globalise such discussions. This book brings to a wider audience the sophisticated range of positions held by various systems of thought in classical India."--Publisher's website.
Review by Choice Review

This work is based on contributions to an international conference titled "Self: Hindu Responses to Buddhist Critiques." As such, it is not so much a dialogue between the two traditions as a collection of essays from respected Hindu philosophers responding to Buddhist critiques on notions of self, primarily from an ontological perspective. The volume touches on the many varying views of self from diverse Hindu perspectives, including Ny~ya, Vaise^D.sika, S~^D.mkhya, Mm~^D.ms~, Advaita Ved~nta, and Kashmir Shaivism. Unfortunately, the majority of essays address critiques that come primarily from the foundational Pali Buddhist traditions; only two essays treat the Yog~c~ra and Madhyamaka philosophical systems in depth. Nonetheless, this book is the most systematic and philosophically adept comparative text from a Hindu perspective that this reviewer has ever read. It is a refreshing change from the highly philosophical debates in the literature that historically come from the Buddhist perspective. This important volume is indispensable for those wanting an in-depth look at the diverse notions of self within the classical Hindu traditions, and the relations they have to Buddhist thought. It is also necessary reading for those studying notions of self from a Western philosophical perspective. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-level undergraduates and above. N. A. Weiss Naropa University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review