The constitutional dimension of European criminal law /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Herlin-Karnell, Ester.
Imprint:Oxford ; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2012.
Description:xxi, 261 p. ; 25 cm.
Language:English
Series:Modern studies in European law ; v. 30
Modern studies in European law ; v. 30.
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8850535
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781849461764
1849461767
Notes:Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Oxford, December, 2009.
Includes bibliographical references (p. [241]-258) and index.
Table of Contents:
  • Preface and Acknowledgements
  • Table of Cases
  • Table of Treaties, Conventions and other Legislative Instruments
  • 1. Introduction
  • I. Introduction
  • II. Brief Comment on the History of EU Criminal Law
  • III. Structure of the Book
  • A. Effectiveness as Enforcement
  • B. Constitutional Effectiveness
  • C. The Development of EU Precautionary Criminalisation and the Fight against Money Laundering
  • D. The Libson Treaty and Criminal Law: Old Problems and New Challenges
  • IV. Final Remarks
  • 2. The Journey of Criminal Law in the EU
  • I. Introduction
  • II. What is at Stake?
  • A. The Framework of EU Criminal Law prior to the Lisbon Treaty
  • B. The Search for Effective Sanctions
  • i. Positive Effect
  • ii. Negative Effect
  • iii. The Principle of Legality
  • iv. Legality: The Fundamentals
  • III. The Historic Third Pillar Web and the Concept of Mutual Recognition
  • A. Pupino and the Quest for 'Depillarisation'/Effectiveness
  • B. Advocaten voor de Wereld and the EAW
  • C. Dell'Orto and the Wider Constitutional Question
  • IV. Supranational Criminal Law
  • A. Effectiveness Revised: Commission v Council
  • B. The Commission's Communication
  • C. The Ship Source Pollution Ruling
  • D. The Failed Attempt to Transfer the Third Pillar via a Bridging Clause
  • E. The Changes brought by the Lisbon Treaty: Introduction
  • i. Article 82 TFEU: Procedural Criminal Law
  • ii. Article 83 TFEU: Substantive Criminal Law
  • iii. Enhanced Cooperation and Emergency Brakes
  • F. Extended Jurisdiction
  • G. The Stockholm Programme
  • H. The ECHR and the Legally Binding Status of the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Comment
  • I. Criminal Law and the Autonomous European Legal Order
  • V. Conclusion
  • 3. Chasing (Traditional) Effectiveness
  • I. Introduction
  • II. The Principle of Effectiveness
  • A. The Concept of Effective Enforcement
  • B. What is EU Effectiveness?
  • C. The Fundamentals of Enforcement
  • i. Short Comment on Non-discrimination and Uniformity
  • ii. The Enforcement Debate
  • III. Effective Enforcement outside the EU's Traditional Borders
  • A. The Renaissance of the 'Implementation Imbalance' in EU Law
  • IV. Effectiveness as a General Principle of Criminal Law
  • A. The Ultimate Legal Threat - Is it Effective?
  • B. Effectiveness in the Context of Case C-176/03
  • V. Conclusion
  • 4. Constitutional Effectiveness: An Exegesis
  • I. Introduction
  • A. The Effectiveness Criteria, Article 83(2) TFEU: No Limits to Criminalisation?
  • II. Conferred Powers and the Objectives of the EU
  • A. Introduction
  • B. How it all Began
  • i. Are Effect Utile and 'Effectiveness' the Same Concept?
  • ii. And 'Necessity'?
  • C. Article 352 TFEU - How Flexible is 'Flexibility'?
  • D. 'Effectiveness' and the History of the acquis communautaire
  • i. The Curious Case of ex Article 47 TEU
  • ii. The Objectives of the EU and Pre-emption
  • E. The New Article 40 TEU
  • i. Centre of Gravity Post Lisbon
  • ii. Articles 67 and 75 TFEU: Setting the Scene of Crime Prevention in the EU
  • iii. (In)Security as the New Acquis Communautaire?
  • F. The Final Word goes to Article 13 TEU: Institutional Balance and the Effectiveness of EU Law
  • G. Conclusion
  • III. Criminal Law and Market Integration
  • A. Introduction
  • B. The Establishment and Functioning of the Internal Market
  • C. The Market Concept: Obstacles to Trade and Distortion of Competition
  • D. Disparities between Laws of Member States as Obstacles
  • E. Obstacles and Market Access
  • F. Preventive Market Creation
  • G. Distortion of (Appreciable) Competition
  • H. Normative Concerns or Why Article 114 TFEU is Difficult to Reconcile with the Attribution of Powers Axiom
  • i. Centre of Gravity and Article 114 TFEU
  • ii. Article 114 TFEU in Relation to ex Article 47 EU
  • iii. Non-market Values as Reasons for Harmonisation
  • I. Confidence in the Market is as Slippery as Effectiveness
  • J. Conclusion
  • IV. Subsidiarity and Proportionality
  • A. Introduction
  • B. Subsidiarity and Proportionality: The Basics
  • i. The Classic Effectiveness Criteria
  • ii. The Concept of Subsidiarity Proper
  • iii. Why Subsidiarity?
  • iv. National Identity as the New 'Safeguard Clause'
  • C. The Concept of Proportionality
  • i. The Court and Proportionality
  • D. Will the National Parliaments do the Trick?
  • E. Subsidiarity and Proportionality in EU Criminal Law
  • i. The ultima ratio of Criminal Law and the Principle of Subsidiarity
  • ii. Subsidiarity and EU Criminal Law: The Paradoxes of Efficiency and Legitimacy
  • iii. The Impact of Proportionality in EU Criminal Law
  • iv. The Bigger Question of Balancing in the AFSJ
  • v. Will the Participation of National Parliaments in Subsidiarity Monitoring increase Penal Populism?
  • F. Conclusion
  • V. Enhanced Cooperation and Loyalty
  • A. Introduction
  • B. The Concept of Enhanced Cooperation
  • C. Emergency Brakes and Accelerators
  • D. Loyalty, Yes but in What Direction?
  • E. Conclusion
  • VI. The Constitutional Debate In Brief
  • A. Introduction
  • B. On the Preservation of Broad Competence Provisions
  • C. The Beginning of de lege feranda
  • D. Conclusion
  • VII. General Conclusion
  • 5. Case Study I: EU Financial Crimes
  • I. Introduction
  • II. Money Laundering
  • A. Introduction
  • B. Tainted Money
  • i. The History of Anti-money Laundering Legislation
  • C. Directive 2005/60/EC
  • i. Regulation No 1889/2005
  • D. The Financing of Terrorism and the Link with Money Laundering
  • i. Short Comment on the Former Third Pillar Dimension
  • E. The Multifaceted Threat of Organised Crime and its Relationship with Money Laundering
  • i. The Tangled Web of EU Anti-corruption Policy
  • F. Why is 'Risk' Important in EU Anti-Money Laundering? Beyond Suspicious Reporting
  • i. Risk-based Approach to Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing
  • ii. What is Risk in EU Law?
  • iii. Risk Assessment from an EU Criminal Law Perspective
  • G. Risk as Security
  • H. The Intersection of Risk, Security and Effectiveness: The Development of Precautionary Criminal Law at the EU Level
  • i. Recent Initiatives: Final Test Case
  • III. The Counterfeiting and Piracy Directive
  • A. An Aspiration to Create EC Criminal Law prior to the Lisbon Treaty
  • i. Criminal Liability for Legal Persons
  • IV. The Confidence Path - Supranational Criminal Law
  • A. Paternalism and Market Failure
  • i. Protective Regulation, for Whom?
  • V. Conclusion
  • 6. Case Study II: What Happens in Practice? The Implementation of the Third Money Laundering Directive in the UK and Sweden
  • I. Introduction
  • II. The UK's Implementation of the EU Money Laundering Directives
  • A. Introduction
  • B. A Brief History of the EU's Anti-money laundering Rules in the UK
  • C. The PoCA 2002
  • D. The 2005 Directive and the UK
  • i. The UK and a Risk-based Approach
  • E. Gold Plating, Money Laundering and Suspicious Reporting
  • F. The Ever-expanding Anti-terrorism Network in the UK
  • i. Judicial Review
  • G. Conclusion: the UK
  • III. Sweden's Implementation of the Anti-money Laundering Directives
  • A. Introduction
  • B. The Swedish Legislature
  • C. The Money Laundering Directives in Sweden
  • i. The 1991 and 2001 Directives
  • D. The 2005 Directive - Confidentiality and Swedish Law
  • i. Corporate Criminal Liability, the Swedish Problem
  • ii. Risk-based Approach
  • E. Sweden and the Financing of Terrorism
  • F. Brief Overview of Denmark and Finland
  • G. Conclusion: Sweden
  • IV. General Conclusion
  • 7. The Lisbon Treaty: Anything New Under the Sun?
  • I. Introduction
  • II. The Emergency Brake - It Looks Safer
  • A. A European Public Prosecutor?
  • III. The Embryonic Concept of a 'General Part' of EU Criminal Law
  • IV. The Court of Justice and Criminal Law
  • A. Expedited Procedure
  • B. Accession to the ECHR and the Legally Binding Status of the Character of Fundamental Rights
  • V. Citizenship and Citizen Initiative
  • VI. Conclusion
  • 8. Conclusion
  • I. Conclusion
  • II. EU Supranational Criminal Law, the (Grand?) Finale
  • Bibliography
  • Other sources
  • Web-links
  • FATF Country reports:
  • Index