Designing case studies : explanatory approaches in small-N research /
Saved in:
Author / Creator: | Blatter, Joachim, 1966- |
---|---|
Imprint: | Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire : Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, ©2012. |
Description: | xviii, 262 pages : illustrations ; 23 cm. |
Language: | English |
Series: | Research methods series Research methods series. |
Subject: | |
Format: | E-Resource Print Book |
URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8863086 |
Table of Contents:
- List of Figures and Tables
- List of Abbreviations
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1. Relevance and Refinements of Case Studies
- 1.1. Case studies as cornerstones for theories and research programs
- 1.2. The case for case study research
- 1.2.1. The growing relevance of timing, cognition, and interdependence
- 1.2.2. Perforated boundaries in social reality and the social sciences
- 1.2.3. Building bridges between paradigmatic camps
- 1.3. The case for a non-fundamentalist and pluralist epistemology
- 1.3.1. Empiricism/Positivism and Critical Rationalism
- 1.3.2. Constructivism/Conventionalism and Critical Theory
- 1.3.3. Pragmatism/Naturalism and Critical Realism
- 1.3.4. The epistemological 'middle ground': Anti-fundamentalist and pluralistic
- 1.4. Case study methodology: A brief history and recent contributions
- 1.5. Case studies: Toward a generic and multidimensional definition
- 1.6. Observations: Toward an adequate understanding of case studies
- 1.7. Three approaches to case study research: An overview
- 1.7.1. Research goals and questions
- 1.7.2. Case and theory selection
- 1.7.3. Data generation and data analysis
- 1.7.4. Generalization
- 2. Co-Variational Analysis
- 2.1. Research goals and research questions
- 2.2. Ontological and epistemological foundations and affinities
- 2.2.1. Experimental template and counterfactual concept of causation
- 2.2.2. Experimental control versus control in observational studies
- 2.2.3. Probabilistic versus deterministic causality
- 2.2.4. Autonomous versus configurational causality
- 2.3. Selecting cases
- 2.3.1. Criteria for case selection
- 2.3.2. Modes of comparison
- 2.3.3. Cross-sectional comparison
- 2.3.4. Intertemporal comparison
- 2.3.5. Cross-sectional-intertemporal comparison
- 2.3.6. Counterfactual comparison
- 2.3.7. Excursus: The method of agreement and the most different systems design
- 2.4. The functions of prior knowledge and theory
- 2.4.1. Specifying the main independent and dependent variable
- 2.4.2. Substantiating the research hypothesis
- 2.4.3. Identifying control variables
- 2.5. Drawing causal inferences for the cases under investigation
- 2.5.1. Data set results and conclusions
- 2.5.2. Examples
- 2.5.3. Concluding remarks
- 2.6. Measurement and data collection
- 2.6.1. Conceptualization and measurement in large-N versus small-N research
- 2.6.2. Determination of classifications and cut-off points
- 2.6.3. Replicability and measurement error
- 2.6.4. Data triangulation
- 2.7. Direction of generalization
- 2.8. Presenting findings and conclusions
- 2.9. Example of best practice: Zangl's Judicalization Matters!
- 2.10. Summary and conclusions
- 2.11. Appendix: How to make counterfactual analysis more compelling
- 3. Causal-Process Tracing
- 3.1. Research goals and research questions
- 3.1.1. Starting points and research goals
- 3.1.2. Research goals and functions of causal-process tracing
- 3.1.3. Research questions
- 3.2. Ontological and epistemological foundations
- 3.2.1. Contingency
- 3.2.2. Causal conditions and configurations
- 3.2.3. Additive and interactive configurations
- 3.2.4. Causal conjunctions and causal chains
- 3.2.5. Social and causal mechanisms
- 3.2.6. Summary
- 3.2.7. Appendix: Contexts
- 3.3. Selecting cases
- 3.3.1. Misleading advice and trade-offs
- 3.3.2. General criteria for selecting cases
- 3.3.3. Specific criteria for selecting cases according to different research goals
- 3.4. Collecting empirical information
- 3.5. Drawing causal inferences for the case(s) under investigation
- 3.5.1. The added value of causal-process observations
- 3.5.2. Major features of causal-process tracing
- 3.5.3. Empirical fundaments of CPT: Storylines, smoking guns, and confessions
- 3.5.4. Logical foundations of CPT I: Causal chains
- 3.5.5. Logical foundations of CPT II: Process dynamics
- 3.6. Examples
- 3.6.1. Brady's Data-Set Observations versus Causal-Process Observations
- 3.6.2. Skocpol's States and Social Revolutions
- 3.6.3. Tannenwald's The Nuclear Taboo
- 3.7. Direction of generalization
- 3.7.1. Implicit and explicit generalizations
- 3.7.2. 'Possibilistic' generalization
- 3.7.3. Drawing conclusions to the sets of causal conditions and configurations
- 3.7.4. Drawing conclusions to the sets of social and causal mechanisms
- 3.8. Presenting findings and conclusions
- 3.9. Summary
- 4. Congruence Analysis
- 4.1. Research goals and research questions
- 4.1.1. Research goals
- 4.1.2. Research questions
- 4.2. Ontological and epistemological foundations and affinities
- 4.2.1. Illustrating the epistemological foundation of the CON approach
- 4.2.2. Relationships between theories
- 4.2.3. Implications for the congruence analysis approach
- 4.3. Selecting theories and cases
- 4.3.1. Selection and specification of theories
- 4.3.2. Selection and specification of cases
- 4.3.3. Crucial cases
- 4.4. Formulating expectations and collecting data
- 4.4.1. The specification of propositions
- 4.4.2. Concrete expectations: Predictions
- 4.4.3. The collection of information and production of data
- 4.5. Data analysis - The congruence analysis proper
- 4.5.1. The steps of the congruence analysis proper
- 4.5.2. The full set of possible conclusions
- 4.5.3. Examples: Applications of the congruence analysis proper
- 4.6. Direction of generalization
- 4.6.1. Theoretical generalization within a competing theories approach
- 4.6.2. Theoretical generalization within a complementary theories approach
- 4.7. Presenting findings and conclusions
- 4.8. Summary
- 5. Combining Diverse Research Approaches
- 5.1. Combining approaches and designs: Purposes and possibilities
- 5.1.1. Strengthening concept validity of descriptive inference
- 5.1.2. Strengthening or testing the internal validity of causal inference
- 5.1.3. Complementing the range of variables, conditions, mechanisms, and theories
- 5.1.4. Increasing the external validity of causal inferences
- 5.2. Combining co-variational analysis and causal-process tracing
- 5.2.1. X-centered combination of COV and CPT
- 5.2.2. Y-centered combination of cross-case comparisons and CPT
- 5.3. Combining congruence analysis and causal-process tracing
- 5.3.1. Causal-process tracing as part of a congruence analysis
- 5.3.2. Causal-process tracing as an inductive addition to the deductive congruence analysis
- 5.4. Connecting case studies to large-N studies
- 5.4.1. Case studies augmenting large-N studies
- 5.4.2. Case studies preceding large-N studies
- 5.5. Connecting case studies to medium-N studies
- 5.5.1. Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a follow-up to case studies
- 5.5.2. Case studies as a follow-up to a Qualitative Comparative Analysis
- 5.6. Preconditions for combining different explanatory approaches
- 5.7. Final remarks
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index