Rethinking scientific change and theory comparison : stabilities, ruptures, incommensurabilities? /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Imprint:Dordrecht : Springer, c2008.
Description:1 online resource (x, 384 p.) : ill.
Language:English
Series:Boston studies in the philosophy of science ; v. 255
Boston studies in the philosophy of science ; v. 255.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8886294
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Soler, Lena, 1966-
Sankey, Howard.
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul, 1946-
ISBN:9781402062797
1402062796
9781402062742 (hb)
1402062745 (hb)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references.
Description based on print version record.
Other form:Print version: Rethinking scientific change and theory comparison. Dordrecht : Springer, c2008 9781402062742 1402062745
Description
Summary:LÉNA SOLER This volume is a collection of essays devoted to the analysis of scientific change and stability. It represents the most recent thinking on the topic of incommensurability and scientific theory change. It explores the balance and tension that exists between commensurability and continuity (or stabilities) on the one hand, and incommen- rability and discontinuity (or ruptures) on the other. And it discusses some central epistemological consequences regarding the nature of scientific progress, rationality and realism. With respect to these topics, it investigates a number of new avenues and revisits some familiar issues, with a focus on the history and philosophy of physics, in a way that is informed by developments in cognitive sciences as well as the claims of "New experimentalists". The essays in this book are fully revised versions of papers which were ori- nally presented at the international colloquium, "Repenser l'évaluation comparative des théories scientifiques: stabilités, ruptures, incommensurabilités?" organized by Léna Soler and Paul Hoyningen-Huene at the University of Nancy, France, in June 2004. Each paper is followed by a critical comment, which either represents an opposing viewpoint or suggests some developments. The conference was a striking example of the sort of genuine dialogue that can take place between philosophers of science, historians of science and scientists who come from different traditions and endorse opposing commitments. I hope that this is evident in the book too and that it will constitute one of its attractions.
Physical Description:1 online resource (x, 384 p.) : ill.
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN:9781402062797
1402062796
9781402062742
1402062745