|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
| 001 |
9333153 |
| 003 |
ICU |
| 005 |
20140423134000.0 |
| 008 |
121213s2013 ilu b 001 0 eng |
| 010 |
|
|
|a 2012050115
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781614388371 (pbk. : alk. paper)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 1614388377 (pbk. : alk. paper)
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a 9333153
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)821560854
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DLC
|b eng
|e rda
|c DLC
|d CLU
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCF
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 042 |
|
|
|a pcc
|
| 043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a CGUA
|
| 050 |
0 |
0 |
|a KF8965
|b .Z474 2013
|
| 082 |
0 |
0 |
|a 347.73/67
|2 23
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Zervopoulos, John A.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a How to examine mental health experts :
|b a family lawyer's handbook of issues and strategies /
|c John A. Zervopoulos, Ph. D., J.D.
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a First edition.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Chicago, Illinois :
|b American Bar Association, Section of Family Law,
|c ©2013.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xxv, 238 pages ;
|c 23 cm
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a unmediated
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a volume
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a How qualified is qualified -- When experts rely on experts -- Consulting versus testifying experts: is there a problem? -- Retained experts and their testimony: hired gun or credible? -- Retaining and working with your expert -- Peer into counseling's black box -- Psychological evaluations: more than just testing -- Make sense of psychological tests -- Psychological tests and catching lies -- Make sense of computer-based test reports -- Collateral information: uses and abuses -- Tie experts to professional practice guidelines -- Let the records show -- Use Daubert's reliability toolbox -- Daubert's reliability toolbox: general acceptance and peer review/publication -- Daubert's reliability toolbox: testability and error rates -- Mental health testimony = conclusions + opinions -- Manage experience-based testimony -- It's research, but is it relevant? -- DSM/IV diagnoses: what's the problem? -- Use the analytical gap test: Joiner's versatile reliability metaphor -- Recognize and challenge experts' judgment biases -- Hiding the gap: the power of words -- Recommendations; where the rubber meets the road -- Interim reports: half-baked or reliable? -- Size up evaluation reports: what's the purpose? -- Mine the report's treasures -- Rescue an expert's testimony? try Daubert's flexibile side.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Evidence, Expert
|z United States.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Forensic psychology.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Evidence, Expert.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00917231
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Forensic psychology.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00932009
|
| 651 |
|
7 |
|a United States.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01204155
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a American Bar Association.
|b Section of Family Law.
|
| 929 |
|
|
|a cat
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i bc09f427-3811-53b2-80be-197fbb5939a1
|s 98e4aa1f-1440-5cbd-96ce-6b6530e21050
|
| 928 |
|
|
|t Library of Congress classification
|a XXKF8965.Z474 2013
|l ASR
|c ASR-LawASR
|i 6657073
|
| 927 |
|
|
|t Library of Congress classification
|a XXKF8965.Z474 2013
|l ASR
|c ASR-LawASR
|e DAVI
|b 72541634
|i 9203821
|
