Lexical relatedness : a paradigm-based model /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Spencer, Andrew, 1953 December 15- author.
Imprint:Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2013.
Description:xxii, 451 pages ; 25 cm.
Language:English
Series:[Oxford linguistics]
[Oxford linguistics].
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/9350920
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780199679928
0199679924
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Table of Contents:
  • Acknowledgements
  • List of figures
  • List of tables
  • List of abbreviations
  • 1. Introduction: words and paradigms
  • 1.1. Morphemes and lexemes
  • 1.2. Words and paradigms
  • 1.2.1. Lexical relatedness
  • 1.2.2. Paradigms
  • 1.3. Overview of the book
  • 1.4. A note on formalization
  • Part I. Lexemes, lexical entries, and lexical relatedness
  • 2. The lexical entry
  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. What is a lexeme?
  • 2.2.1. Refining the lexical entry
  • 2.2.2. Semantic representations of lexemes
  • 2.2.3. Phonological representations of lexemes
  • 2.2.4. Syntactic representations of lexemes
  • 2.3. Semantics and syntax
  • 2.3.1. The semantic function role
  • 2.3.2. Relating lexical attributes: the categorial cascade
  • 2.3.3. The redundancy of syntactic categories
  • 2.4. Lexemes and the inflection/derivation distinction
  • 2.5. Non-standard types of lexical representation
  • 2.5.1. Degenerate lexical entries
  • 2.5.2. The lexeme identification problem
  • 3. Lexical relatedness
  • 3.1. Types of lexical relatedness
  • 3.2. Canonical inflection vs canonical derivation
  • 3.3. Transpositions
  • 3.3.1. Action nominals
  • 3.3.2. Participles
  • 3.3.3. Relational and possessive adjectives
  • 3.3.4. Property nominalizations
  • 3.3.5. Predicative nouns and adjectives
  • 3.3.6. Transpositions as 'mixed categories'
  • 3.4. Meaning and inflection
  • 3.4.1. Contextual and inherent inflection
  • 3.4.2. Putative examples of inherent inflection
  • 3.4.3. Semantically contentful inflection
  • 3.5. Argument-structure operations
  • 3.5.1. Valency-decreasing operations
  • 3.5.2. Valency-increasing operations
  • 3.5.3. Argument-structure operations as a form of lexical relatedness
  • 3.5.4. Argument nominalizations
  • 3.6. Meaningless derivation
  • 3.7. Evaluative morphology: diminutives and augmentatives
  • 3.7.1. Evaluative morphology and adjectives
  • 3.7.2. Evaluative morphology and verbs
  • 3.8. Paradigmatically mixed lexical categories
  • 3.8.1. M-inert derivation: stolovaja-nouns
  • 3.8.2. Within-lexeme derivation
  • 3.8.3. Morphological shift
  • 3.8.4. Verbal case in Kayardild
  • 3.9. Syntagmatic reflexes of mixed categories
  • 3.10. The nature of lexical relatedness
  • 3.11. Implications of types of lexical relatedness
  • Part II. Paradigmatic organization and the lexicon
  • 4. Paradigm Function Morphology
  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Brief overview of PFM
  • 4.2.1. Realization rules
  • 4.2.2. Paradigm functions
  • 4.3. Affix ordering
  • 4.3.1. Three types of deviation
  • 4.3.2. Portmanteau position classes
  • 4.3.3. Parallel position classes
  • 4.3.4. Reversible position classes
  • 4.4. Rules of referral
  • 4.5. Allomorphy in PFM: morphological metageneralizations
  • 4.6. Stems in PFM
  • 4.6.1. The nature of stems
  • 4.6.2. Paradigm linkage in PFM
  • 4.6.3. Stems and the English verb
  • 4.7. Derivational morphology in PFM
  • 4.7.1. Derivational paradigms
  • 4.7.2. Derivational paradigms in PFM
  • 4.8. Head marking and the Head-Application Principle
  • 4.9. Appendix: revised notational conventions for Paradigm Function Morphology
  • 5. Lexical entries and the generalized paradigm function
  • 5.1. Introduction
  • 5.2. Shared information in lexical entries: the role of the lexemic index
  • 5.3. The generalized paradigm function-a first pass
  • 5.4. Representing stems
  • 5.5. Morpholexical properties
  • 5.5.1. Morpholexical class
  • 5.5.2. Morpholexical signatures
  • 5.5.3. Stems and the morpholexical signature
  • 5.5.4. Morpholexical signature and derivation
  • 5.6. The generalized paradigm function and the lexical entry
  • 5.6.1. Lexical entries as rules
  • 5.6.2. The Default Cascade
  • 5.7. Affix order, semantic scope, and the GPF
  • 5.8. A unified view of lexical relatedness
  • Part III. The factorized lexicon
  • 6. Representing lexical relatedness
  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Formal approaches to lexical relatedness
  • 6.3. Derivation
  • 6.4. Canonical inflection and semantic interpretation
  • 6.4.1. The problem of meaningful morphology
  • 6.4.2. Affix order, syntax, and semantic interpretation
  • 6.4.3. The Daghestan case hoax
  • 6.4.4. Case stacking in Australian languages
  • 6.4.5. Affix ordering: summary
  • 6.5. Transpositions
  • 6.6. Representing argument structure
  • 6.7. Argument nominalizations
  • 6.8. Paradigmatically mixed categories
  • 6.8.1. M-inert lexical relatedness
  • 6.8.2. Within-lexeme derivation
  • 6.8.3. Morphological shift: the Russian past tense
  • 6.9. Evaluative morphology
  • 6.9.1. Transparency and evaluative morphology
  • 6.9.2. Analysis of diminutives
  • 6.10. Meaningless derivation
  • 6.11. Implications of intermediate types for a model of lexical relatedness
  • 7. The form and function of argument-structure representations
  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Justifying argument structure
  • 7.3. Semantics and syntax
  • 7.3.1. The semantic function role
  • 7.3.2. Argument-structure represented as AVMs
  • 7.3.3. The causative as a case study for lexical relatedness
  • 7.4. Argument-structure alternations mediated by conversion
  • 7.4.1. Complementation patterns as constructions
  • 7.4.2. Polysemy and lexical relatedness more generally
  • 7.5. Conclusions
  • 8. Nominalizations
  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Action nominalizations as syntactically mixed categories
  • 8.3. Approaches to categorial mixing
  • 8.4. The semantics of nominalizations
  • 8.4.1. Nominalizations as asemantic transpositions
  • 8.4.2. Eventualities, propositions, and states-of-affairs
  • 8.4.3. German nominalizations and lexical aspect
  • 8.4.4. Russian nominalizations and grammatical aspect
  • 8.5. Analysis of deverbal nominalizations
  • 8.5.1. English nominalizations
  • 8.5.2. Mixed categories and syntactic category labels
  • 8.6. Nominalized adjectives
  • 8.7. The interpretation of nominalizations: summary
  • 8.8. Defining nominalizations
  • 8.8.1. Nominalizations as constructions
  • 8.8.2. Morphosyntactic aspects of deverbal nominals
  • 8.9. Summary
  • 9. Further instances of transposition
  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Deverbal participles
  • 9.3. Noun-to-adjective transpositions
  • 9.3.1. Adjectival genitives
  • 9.3.2. Derived adjectives and meaningful transpositions
  • 9.4. Transposition to verb
  • 9.5. Transpositions of transpositions
  • 9.6. Conclusions: when is a lexeme not a lexeme?
  • 10. Lexical relatedness in Selkup
  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Basic parts of speech in Selkup
  • 10.2.1. Verbs
  • 10.2.2. Nouns
  • 10.3. Derivational morphology
  • 10.3.1. Argument-structure alternations
  • 10.3.2. Modes-of-action
  • 10.3.3. Argument nominalizations
  • 10.3.4. Evaluative morphology
  • 10.3.5. Other types of derived verb or noun
  • 10.3.6. Derived adjectives
  • 10.4. Deverbal transpositions
  • 10.4.1. Participles
  • 10.4.2. Deverbal nominalizations
  • 10.4.3. Deverbal adverbs (gerunds)
  • 10.4.4. Deverbal transpositions: summary
  • 10.5. Less important transpositions from adjectives and nouns
  • 10.6. Selkup denominal adjectives
  • 10.6.1. Three types of N-to-A transposition
  • 10.6.2. Summary of Selkup denominal adjectives
  • 10.7. Analysis of Selkup lexical relatedness
  • 10.8. Selkup summary
  • 10.9. Appendices
  • 11. Conclusions
  • 11.1. Lexical relatedness: a summary
  • 11.2. Implications of lexical relatedness
  • References
  • Index of languages
  • Index of names
  • Index of subjects