In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Language:English
Format: Book E-Resource
_version_ 1819231041349484544
author2 General Electric Company
author_browse General Electric Company
author_facet General Electric Company
General Electric Company
author_sort General Electric Company.
building Internet
collection Hathi Collection
contents Binder's title, v.1-2: Wrought tungsten case. v.3-7: Tungsten and method of making the same.
ctrlnum (OCoLC)45606836
format Book
E-Resource
fullrecord 01016cam a2200229L 4500001001300000007000300013003000600016005001700022008004100039040001300080035002000093049000900113110003000122245024000152260003900392300003400431500009700465650002400562650002000586776016800606994001200774ocm45606836 crOCoLC20100908040151.0001220s1917 nyuaf 000 0 eng d aZCUcZCU a(OCoLC)45606836 aCGUA2 aGeneral Electric Company.10aIn the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey.bGeneral Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ... aAlbany, N.Y.,bHollenbeckc[1917?] a8 v.bplates, diagrs.c28 cm. aBinder's title, v.1-2: Wrought tungsten case. v.3-7: Tungsten and method of making the same. 0aIncandescent lamps. 0aTungsten lamps.08iOnline version:aGeneral Electric Company.tIn the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey.dAlbany, N.Y., Hollenbeck [1917?]w(OCoLC)653637205 aC0bCGU
id ocm45606836
illustrated Illustrated
import_time 2024-12-23T11:38:39.484Z
institution The University of Chicago
language English
notes Binder's title, v.1-2: Wrought tungsten case. v.3-7: Tungsten and method of making the same.
oclc_num 45606836
physical 8 v. plates, diagrs. 28 cm.
publication_place Albany, N.Y.,
publishDate 1917
publisher Hollenbeck
recordtype hathi
spelling General Electric Company.
In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
Albany, N.Y., Hollenbeck [1917?]
8 v. plates, diagrs. 28 cm.
Binder's title, v.1-2: Wrought tungsten case. v.3-7: Tungsten and method of making the same.
Incandescent lamps.
Tungsten lamps.
Online version: General Electric Company. In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. Albany, N.Y., Hollenbeck [1917?] (OCoLC)653637205
spellingShingle In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
Binder's title, v.1-2: Wrought tungsten case. v.3-7: Tungsten and method of making the same.
Incandescent lamps
Tungsten lamps
title In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
title_author In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
title_author_exact In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
title_browse In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey.
title_browse_sort In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 .
In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey
title_full In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
title_fullStr In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
title_full_exact In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
title_full_unstemmed In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey. General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
title_short In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey.
title_short_exact In the District Court of the United States, district of New Jersey.
title_sort in the district court of the united states district of new jersey general electric company plaintiff vs independent lamp and wire company inc defendant in equity no 648 on coolidge patent no 1 082 933 december 30 1913
title_sub General Electric Company, plaintiff, vs. Independent Lamp and Wire Company, Inc., defendant. In equity no. 648 on Coolidge patent no. 1,082,933, December 30, 1913 ...
topic Incandescent lamps
Tungsten lamps
topic_browse Incandescent Lamps
Tungsten Lamps