Abbott v. Abbott. Is a Ne Exeat Right a "Right of Custody" Under the Hague Convention?.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Corporate author / creator:	Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Imprint:	[S.l] : [s.n.], 2010.
Description:	12 p. : digital, PDF file.
Language:	English
Subject:	Judge-made law. Families. Circuit courts.
Format:	E-Resource U.S. Federal Government Document Book
URL for this record:	http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10535550

Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other uniform titles:	ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection.
Notes:	Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Sept. 2012). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. CRS Report.
Summary:	Provides background on the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, to which the U.S. is signatory, and Eleventh Circuit ruling in Furnes v. Reeves regarding interpretation of Hague Convention. Reviews Abbott v. Abbott, concerning whether a ne exeat, or "no exit," order granting one parent the right to veto another parents decision to remove their child from his or her home country is a "right of custody" under the Hague Convention, and lower courts rulings. Outlines arguments before Supreme Court in Abbot, and considers implications of Supreme Court ruling.
Other form:	Microfiche version: Library of Congress.Congressional Research Service. Abbott v. Abbott

Similar Items