Abbott v. Abbott. Is a Ne Exeat Right a "Right of Custody" Under the Hague Convention?.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate author / creator:Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Imprint:[S.l] : [s.n.], 2010.
Description:12 p. : digital, PDF file.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource U.S. Federal Government Document Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10535550
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other uniform titles:ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection.
Notes:Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Sept. 2012). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
CRS Report.
Summary:Provides background on the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, to which the U.S. is signatory, and Eleventh Circuit ruling in Furnes v. Reeves regarding interpretation of Hague Convention. Reviews Abbott v. Abbott, concerning whether a ne exeat, or "no exit," order granting one parent the right to veto another parents decision to remove their child from his or her home country is a "right of custody" under the Hague Convention, and lower courts rulings. Outlines arguments before Supreme Court in Abbot, and considers implications of Supreme Court ruling.
Other form:Microfiche version: Library of Congress.Congressional Research Service. Abbott v. Abbott

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000001a 4500
001 10535550
006 m d f
007 cr bn mmmapmmp
008 110721s2010 dcu s f000 0 eng d
003 ICU
040 |a UMI  |c UMI 
084 |a CRS-2010-AML-0131 
110 2 |a Library of Congress.  |b Congressional Research Service. 
245 1 0 |a Abbott v. Abbott.  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Is a Ne Exeat Right a "Right of Custody" Under the Hague Convention?. 
260 |a [S.l] :  |b [s.n.],  |c 2010. 
300 |a 12 p. :  |b digital, PDF file. 
500 |a Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Sept. 2012). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. 
500 |a CRS Report. 
520 |a Provides background on the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, to which the U.S. is signatory, and Eleventh Circuit ruling in Furnes v. Reeves regarding interpretation of Hague Convention. Reviews Abbott v. Abbott, concerning whether a ne exeat, or "no exit," order granting one parent the right to veto another parents decision to remove their child from his or her home country is a "right of custody" under the Hague Convention, and lower courts rulings. Outlines arguments before Supreme Court in Abbot, and considers implications of Supreme Court ruling. 
650 0 |a Judge-made law. 
650 0 |a Families. 
650 0 |a Circuit courts. 
730 0 |a ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. 
776 0 8 |i Microfiche version:   |a Library of Congress.Congressional Research Service.  |t Abbott v. Abbott 
856 4 0 |u http://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2010-AML-0131  |y ProQuest Congressional 
035 |a cis2007904085 
929 |a nox 
999 f f |i 3e43d471-33cf-57b4-bc73-0bd12eda6326  |s 07a1782c-5818-5744-9c39-2a91608128c5 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2010-AML-0131  |z ProQuest Congressional  |g ebooks  |i 8716979