Campaign Finance Regulation Under the First Amendment Buckley v. Valeo and Its Supreme Court Progeny

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Corporate author / creator:	Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Imprint:	[S.l] : [s.n.], 2000.
Description:	35 p. : digital, PDF file.
Language:	English
Subject:	Campaign funds. Judge-made law. Constitutional law.
Format:	E-Resource U.S. Federal Government Document Book
URL for this record:	http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10598587

Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other uniform titles:	ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection.
Notes:	Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed July 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. CRS Report.
Summary:	Discusses Supreme Court views on campaign finance regulation and constitutionality of the Federal Election Campaign Act in the First Amendment case of Buckley v. Valeo, and subsequent cases. Looks at contribution and expenditure limits, disclosure requirements, ballot initiatives, corporate expenditures, labor union solicitation of political action committee funds, political party and committee expenditures, and leaflet distribution in issue-based elections.
Other form:	Microfiche version: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Campaign Finance Regulation Under the First Amendment: Buckley v. Valeo and Its Supreme Court Progeny

Similar Items