Campaign Finance Law and the Constitutionality of the "Millionaire's Amendment" An Analysis of Davis v. Federal Election Commission.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Corporate author / creator:	Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Imprint:	[S.l] : [s.n.], 2008.
Description:	6 p. : digital, PDF file.
Language:	English
Subject:	Campaign funds. Judge-made law. Constitutional law.
Format:	E-Resource U.S. Federal Government Document Book
URL for this record:	http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10698072

Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other uniform titles:	ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection.
Notes:	Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. CRS Report.
Summary:	Provides legal analysis of Davis v. Federal Election Commission regarding Section 319(a) of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, known as the "Millionaire's Amendment," which established increased contribution limits for Congressional candidates whose opponents significantly self-finance their campaigns. Examines Supreme Court ruling that Section 319(a) is unconstitutional, as it undermines compelling governmental interest of lessening corruption or the appearance of corruption.
Other form:	Microfiche version: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Campaign Finance Law and the Constitutionality of the "Millionaire's Amendment"

Similar Items