The myth of judicial activism : making sense of Supreme Court decisions /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Roosevelt, Kermit, 1971-
Imprint:New Haven : Yale University Press, ©2006.
Description:1 online resource (viii, 262 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11151619
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780300129564
0300129564
0300114680
9780300114683
128173036X
9781281730367
9786611730369
6611730362
0300114680
9780300114683
Digital file characteristics:data file
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 237-246) and index.
Restrictions unspecified
Electronic reproduction. [Place of publication not identified] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010.
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
English.
digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve
Print version record.
Summary:This carefully considered book is a welcome addition to the debate over judicial activism. Constitutional scholar Kermit Roosevelt III offers an elegantly simple way to resolve the heated discord between conservatives, who argue that the Constitution is immutable, and progressives, who insist that it is a living document that must be reinterpreted in new cultural contexts so that its meaning evolves. Roosevelt uses plain language and compelling examples to explain how the Constitution can be both a constant and an organic document. Recent years have witnessed an increasing drumbeat of complaints about judicial behavior, focusing particularly on Supreme Court decisions that critics charge are reflections of the Justices political preferences rather than enforcement of the Constitution. The author takes a balanced look at these controversial decisions through a compelling new lens of constitutional interpretation. He clarifies the task of the Supreme Court in constitutional cases, then sets out a model to describe how the Court creates doctrine to implement the meaning of the Constitution. Finally, Roosevelt uses this model to show which decisions can be justified as legitimate and which cannot.
Other form:Print version: Roosevelt, Kermit, 1971- Myth of judicial activism. New Haven : Yale University Press, ©2006 0300114680 9780300114683
Standard no.:9780300114683