Review of NASA's evidence reports on human health risks : 2015 letter report /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate author / creator:Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee to Review NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks, author.
Imprint:Washington, DC. : National Academies Press, [2016]
Description:1 online resource (1 PDF file (x, 72 pages)) : illustrations
Language:English
Series:Online access: NCBI NCBI Bookshelf.
Online access: National Academy of Sciences National Academies Press.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11253088
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Scott-Conner, Carol E. H., editor.
Masys, Daniel, editor.
Liverman, Catharyn T., editor.
ISBN:9780309380621
0309380626
9780309380614
0309380618
Digital file characteristics:data file
Notes:Includes bibliographical references.
This project was supported by Contract NNH13CK19B, Task Order NNH13CK20D, between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.
Online resource; title from PDF title page (viewed June 20, 2016).
Summary:Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks 2015 Letter Report is the third in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews seven evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.
Other form:Print version: Review of NASAs Evidence reports on human health risks. Washington, DC : National Academies Press, [2016] 9780309380614
Standard no.:10.17226/21844