The principle and practice of women's "full citizenship" : a case study of sex-segregated education /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Hasday, Jill Elaine.
Imprint:Chicago, Ill. : Law School, University of Chicago, 2006.
Description:64 p.
Language:English
Series:Public law and legal theory working paper; 35
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/6202073
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:University of Chicago. Law School.
Notes:Title from homepage, University of Chicago Law School (viewed on Dec. 20, 2006)
Includes bibliographical references.
Also available in paper.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Summary:"The Supreme Court has repeatedly declared that sex-based state action is subject to heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause. But the Court has always been much less clear about what that standard allows and what it prohibits. For this reason, it is especially noteworthy that one of the Court's most recent sex discrimination opinions, United States v. Virginia, purports to provide more coherent guidance. Virginia suggests that the constitutionality of sex-based state action turns on whether the practice at issue denies women "full citizenship stature" or "create[s] or perpetuate[s] the legal, social, and economic inferiority of women." This Article attempts to give some content to the framework that Virginia presents. More specifically, it explores how analyzing the historical record of a practice can inform an investigation into whether, when, and why that practice is consistent with women's "full citizenship stature" or operates to perpetuate their "legal, social, and economic inferiority. The Article takes the historical record of sex-segregated public education in the United States as its case study."