Two conceptions of irreversible environmental harm /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Sunstein, Cass R., author.
Imprint:[Chicago, Illinois] : Law School, University of Chicago, 2008.
Description:1 online resource (29 pages)
Language:English
Series:John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper ; no. 407 (2d series)
Public law and legal theory working paper ; no. 218
John M. Olin Program in Law & Economics working paper ; 2nd ser., no. 407.
Public law and legal theory working paper ; no. 218.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8919617
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Notes:"May 2008."
Includes bibliographical references.
Title from online title page (viewed October 11, 2012).
Summary:"The concept of 'irreversibility' plays a large role in the theory and practice of environmental protection. Indeed, the concept is explicit in some statements of the Precautionary Principle. But the idea of irreversibility remains poorly defined. Because time is linear, any loss is, in a sense, irreversible. On one approach, drawn from environmental economics, irreversibility might be understood as a reference to the value associated with taking precautionary steps that maintain flexibility for an uncertain future ('option value'). On another approach, drawn from environmental ethics, irreversibility might be understood to refer to the qualitatively distinctive nature of certain environmental harms - a point that raises a claim about incommensurability. The two conceptions fit different problems. For example, the idea of option value best fits the problem of climate change; the idea of qualitatively distinctive harms best fits the problem of extinction of endangered species. These ideas can be applied to a wide assortment of environmental problems."