Ponzi schemes and law's domain /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Levmore, Saul, author.
Imprint:Chicago, Illinois : Law School, University of Chicago, Oct. 3, 2011.
Description:1 online file (1 audio file) (59 mins., 53 secs.) : digital, stereo, MP3.
Language:English
Series:Chicago's best ideas
Chicago's best ideas.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Spoken word recording Audio Streaming Audio
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/9129171
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:University of Chicago. Law School, hosting institution.
Computer file characteristics:MP3
Sound characteristics:digital stereo
Digital file characteristics:audio file MP3 128Kbps
Notes:Recorded Oct. 2, 3011, posted Oct. 6, 2011.
Summary:"Ponzi schemes come in many sizes. The colossal fraud engineered by Bernard Madoff is an occasion to rethink the legal rules and remedies associated with such episodes. But then there are smaller Ponzi-like schemes, such as fraud in law school admissions, and the question of whether law does or should play any role. At the other extreme are nation-size Ponzi schemes, such as our recent mortgage-and-foreclosure crisis and, similarly perhaps, long-range deficit spending in many countries, such that one generation defrauds another. In this CBI, Professor Saul Levmore asks why law might be much better at one of these levels than at the others. Concrete problems can help us understand law's comfort zone, or its proper domain."--Law School faculty podcast webpage.
Other form:Video