Before the Nation : Kokugaku and the Imagining of Community in Early Modern Japan /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Burns, Susan L, author.
Imprint:Durham : Duke University Press, [2003]
©2003
Description:1 online resource (294 p.)
Language:English
Series:Asia-Pacific: Culture, Politics, and Society : 44
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/13918537
Related Items:Title is part of eBook package: Duke University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Chow, Rey, editor.
Harootunian, Harry, editor.
Huntington, Madge, editor.
Miyoshi, Masao, editor.
ISBN:9780822384908
Digital file characteristics:text file PDF
Notes:In English.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)
Summary:Exploring the emergence and evolution of theories of nationhood that continue to be evoked in present-day Japan, Susan L. Burns provides a close examination of the late-eighteenth-century intellectual movement kokugaku, which means "the study of our country." Departing from earlier studies of kokugaku that focused on intellectuals whose work has been valorized by modern scholars, Burns seeks to recover the multiple ways "Japan" as social and cultural identity began to be imagined before modernity.Central to Burns's analysis is Motoori Norinaga's Kojikiden, arguably the most important intellectual work of Japan's early modern period. Burns situates the Kojikiden as one in a series of attempts to analyze and interpret the mythohistories dating from the early eighth century, the Kojiki and Nihon shoki. Norinaga saw these texts as keys to an original, authentic, and idyllic Japan that existed before being tainted by "flawed" foreign influences, notably Confucianism and Buddhism. Hailed in the nineteenth century as the begetter of a new national consciousness, Norinaga's Kojikiden was later condemned by some as a source of Japan's twentieth-century descent into militarism, war, and defeat. Burns looks in depth at three kokugaku writers-Ueda Akinari, Fujitani Mitsue, and Tachibana Moribe-who contested Norinaga's interpretations and produced competing readings of the mythohistories that offered new theories of community as the basis for Japanese social and cultural identity. Though relegated to the footnotes by a later generation of scholars, these writers were quite influential in their day, and by recovering their arguments, Burns reveals kokugaku as a complex debate-involving history, language, and subjectivity-with repercussions extending well into the modern era.
Standard no.:10.1515/9780822384908
Review by Choice Review

Burns (Univ. of Chicago) offers a revisionist history that calls into question the received understandings of Kokugaku (national studies), particularly its relations with modern Japanese nationalism. She suggests a way to rearticulate "complex and multiple relations between premodern representations of community and the modern nation." Previous scholarship of Kokugaku tended to analyze premodern (Tokugawa) discourse on Japanese identity as the precursor of modern Japanese nationalism. Burns challenges the linearity of this mode of historical analysis by showing a variety of often-competing Tokugawa discourses on Japanese identity between the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Her choice of relatively "unknown" scholars of Kokugaku is a strategic move to demonstrate the lack of linearity and to introduce the multivocal quality of Kokugaku discourse. For example, Burns contends that Ueda Akinari (1734-1809), a Kokugaku scholar and writer, proposed a conception of Japan radically different from that created by the most celebrated Kokugaku scholar, Motoori Norinaga (1730-1801). Burns argues that the new modern (Meiji) regime appropriated Kokugaku scholars' vocabulary and set of epistemological strategies to forge nationalism. ^BSumming Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. K. Hirano Indiana University South Bend

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review